完全可以把do you want ... 看作提建议的句型,与would you like在许多场合下可以互换。例如:—— Do you want to leave now so we can arrive there on time?—— Good idea!would you like语气更委婉,更礼貌。
回答于 2023-05-19 16:41
看懂词典的话题太大了,下面只针对上面提到的问题做一点探讨:1. 把上面词典上的释义带到原句,一般都没有问题,说明一般是可以替换的。2. 个别情况下不能替换,例如This may take longer than we thought. 这里的longer相当于a longer time。然后你会发现,在别的词典上,long有名词的词性,比如麦克米伦(= a long period...
回答于 2023-05-19 16:29
What became of my life was as much a factor of the inequities that exist in our society today as it was (a factor of) my skills, my talents and my work ethic.简化一下,去掉定从,再省略比较分句中与主句重复的部分:What became of my life was as much a factor of the inequities as my skills, my talents a...
回答于 2023-05-10 22:01
1. 关系副词where相当于介词+which,但这里如果使用where,语义不明确,容易造成误解,没有on which明确。2. 本来的语序是the words “Labor Is Sacred” were written on which,on which引导定语从句,所以要提前;加之避免头重脚轻,主语后置,于是构成了全部倒装的句式:on which were written the words “Labor Is Sacre...
回答于 2023-05-10 11:47
从属连词引导一个主句——这个说法本身自相矛盾。这里展示的是actually的用法,对上一句的信息(for years)进行补充、纠正,相当于I’ve known Barbara since we were babies, actually.
回答于 2023-05-10 11:26
1. 首先专有名词前通常不能使用冠词,比如,你不会说a Tom’s book。这里如果要用Japan’s,可以改写为one of Japan’s submarines.2. Japanese是形容词,经常前面需要加限定词,而Japan’s为专有名词所有格,前面不再需要限定词。例如:Japan’s population / the Japanese population。3. Japan’s更侧重所有关系,Japanese更侧...
回答于 2023-05-10 09:23
这个表格中的should表示的是,主语为第一人称(I、we)时,可以用should,意思与would相同,而would可以用于所有人称。也就是说,should在上面的表格里不表示“应该”的意思。
回答于 2023-05-09 16:45
1)more of a clear Z sound √more of a PR √ a little bit more of a clear Z sound √以上都是more + of + 名词短语,这个名词短语是相对完整的,也就是说,如果是可数的,就需要加限定词,比如冠词。2) [a little bit] more clear Z sound × 这个短语与上面的more of ...结构已经不同(没有of了),是形容词比较级+名词...
回答于 2023-05-09 09:35
如果一种理解行不通,不妨换一种思路。halfway ≈ at the middle pointyou're halfway 主系表 ≈ you are at the middle point
回答于 2023-05-08 11:54
阅读文章的时候,要注意上下文的关联。某个地方一时存在疑问,通过瞻前顾后,往往还是能够理顺关系,读懂意思的。这里的it becomes about them having Down syndromes简化一下,就是it is about sth,而这里的sth是一个动名词复合结构(具体语法结构划分可能存在争议)。it表示某种处境、情况的意思。句意为“情况就成了他们...
回答于 2023-05-08 11:03