你的理解基本正确。但事件并非都是单一事件。比如某人去年去了北京三次,这还是事件意义。即事件可以是单一事件,也可以是多个事件,但不是规律性、周期性的重复。只有规律性、周期性重复发生的事件才是习惯。习惯的结束是不可预料的,所以为静态意义。
回答于 1秒前
Barcelona are yet to table a formal offer for Neymar. for Neymar是修饰offer的,为后置定语。介词短语可以作定语也可以作状语。语法只能告诉你这么多。至于具体某个介词短语是什么成分,需要你从逻辑上分析介词短语是修饰名词的还是修饰动词的。巴塞罗那俱乐部想要得到内马尔就得出一个价格,这就是 an offer for...
回答于 1秒前
appropriate 改为副词 appropriately:As I said, we will act as appropriately to sustain expansion.as I said 即传统语法所说的as引导的非限制性定语从句,as指代主句内容。这种as从句可以谓语句首、句末或插入主谓之间。第二个as为程度副词,意为同样地,修饰方式副词appropriately,在句子中作act的方式状语。
回答于 1秒前
I took a seat at the end of the hearthstone opposite that towards which my landlord advanced.= I took a seat at the end of the hearthstone opposite what my landlord advanced towards.what=that which。由于有的人不喜欢用介词结束一个句子,所以将what改为that which, 然后which作介词towards的宾语,towa...
回答于 1秒前
现代语法将词类分为十二类,其中限定词就是十二大词类之一。所以既然你用了限定词这个术语,就意味着你采用现代语法体系,就不应再问some是什么词类,它就是限定词。传统语法没有限定词这个术语,认为some用在名词前为形容词,单独作名词性成分时为代词。some用在数词前则为副词,意为大约。
回答于 1秒前
How long will it take to do sth?虽然有的词典(如《韦氏》)赋予了long名词词性,因为long可以作及物动词take的宾语,也也可以作介词before和for的宾语,但也有词典(如《牛津》)坚持认为long还是形容词,即使它作了及物动词和介词的宾语,因而将take long, before long, for long当作惯用法对待。那么我们应该怎么看待...
回答于 1秒前
much as: althoughShe knew the truth, much as [=even though] she wanted to deny it.美式英语有时会在前面加上as. COCA例句:As much as we wish it would be, it simply isn't. As much as I respect the the Seuss-man, it turns out he was wrong.
回答于 1秒前
按照传统语法分析,以上二句中的compared to结构都是过去分词短语作状语。是对前面句子内容的补充说明,意为与...形式对比。《剑桥语法》称此为补充语(supplement)。也可以分析为插入语。
回答于 1秒前
remaining 在此为现在分词演变的形容词作定语,表示主动意义。用remained作定语为被动意义,是错误的。but not discarding...应改为 but without discarding.but后省略了相同的主语和谓语动词,without介词短语作条件/伴随状语。
回答于 1秒前
Stung in the past by criticism of bungling that allowed fires to spread when they might have been contained过去分词短语作原因状语, personnel主语 are meeting谓语动词 the peculiar challenges of neighbourhood - and canyon - hopping fires宾语 better than previously方式状语, observers say引述分句作插入语...
回答于 1秒前