现代语法将词类分为十二类,其中限定词就是十二大词类之一。所以既然你用了限定词这个术语,就意味着你采用现代语法体系,就不应再问some是什么词类,它就是限定词。传统语法没有限定词这个术语,认为some用在名词前为形容词,单独作名词性成分时为代词。some用在数词前则为副词,意为大约。
回答于 1秒前
How long will it take to do sth?虽然有的词典(如《韦氏》)赋予了long名词词性,因为long可以作及物动词take的宾语,也也可以作介词before和for的宾语,但也有词典(如《牛津》)坚持认为long还是形容词,即使它作了及物动词和介词的宾语,因而将take long, before long, for long当作惯用法对待。那么我们应该怎么看待...
回答于 1秒前
much as: althoughShe knew the truth, much as [=even though] she wanted to deny it.美式英语有时会在前面加上as. COCA例句:As much as we wish it would be, it simply isn't. As much as I respect the the Seuss-man, it turns out he was wrong.
回答于 1秒前
按照传统语法分析,以上二句中的compared to结构都是过去分词短语作状语。是对前面句子内容的补充说明,意为与...形式对比。《剑桥语法》称此为补充语(supplement)。也可以分析为插入语。
回答于 1秒前
remaining 在此为现在分词演变的形容词作定语,表示主动意义。用remained作定语为被动意义,是错误的。but not discarding...应改为 but without discarding.but后省略了相同的主语和谓语动词,without介词短语作条件/伴随状语。
回答于 1秒前
Stung in the past by criticism of bungling that allowed fires to spread when they might have been contained过去分词短语作原因状语, personnel主语 are meeting谓语动词 the peculiar challenges of neighbourhood - and canyon - hopping fires宾语 better than previously方式状语, observers say引述分句作插入语...
回答于 1秒前
理解一个英语动词的语义以及用法,不能根据汉译,而应该根据英英释义。看词典释义和例句:b [+ object] : to write or say the exact words of (someone)He began his speech by quoting Shakespeare.Can I quote you on that? [=can I tell other people that you said that?]He was q...
回答于 1秒前
Beijing University was the first institute of higher learning to be established/to have been established in China.表示主语是第几个做某事的人或物这个意义时,用不定式作定语,不定式与被修饰名词为逻辑主谓关系。不定式的动作在系词be的时间之前已经发生过了,即不定式表示的是先于谓语动词的动作。按理这里...
回答于 1秒前
1 to my credit 暗示账户上增加的钱数,而不是账户上实际有的钱数。隐含added to my credit的意思。翻译时应该译为我的户头上多了100万,而不是有了100万。2 sb be fixed. 中,fixed为形容词,非正式用法,意为某人有他所需要的东西。例如,Tom is fixed for food. = Tom has a good supply of food. 你的句子中根据上下文...
回答于 1秒前
第一句中by doing表示方式。第二句中by+数量表示净增减量。这种用法的by你一定见过,只是你不注意句子的逻辑而忽略了。你要注意逻辑问题,否则你的问题会层出不穷。如果你注意了句子的逻辑,很多问题你不用问别人,不用查词典,自己就能分析解决。
回答于 1秒前