问题一Autocratic societies have an easier time (in) imposing strict behavioral limits than democratic ones.相比于民主社会,专制社会强制实施行为限制要容易得多。请问"time”怎么理解?《韦氏高阶》time[count] : the quality of a person's experience on a particular occasion or during a pa...
回答于 1秒前
你理解错误。名词所有格是中位限定词,但其本身还是名词,需要自己的限定词。the world中的the 是world的限定词,并不是paintings的限定词。对于paintings而言,只有一个中位先行词,即名词所有格the world's。再看一个例子。那个男孩的父亲:that boy's father. 表面上看,that和所有格都是中位限定词,但实际上,...
回答于 1秒前
告诉你简单的类似的发音。/djə/: 你把汉语拼音dia (嗲)中的a 换成 e , 然后弱读即可。/dʒə/: 你在读soldier(士兵)['səʊldʒə] 这个词的时候,已经知道怎么读了。相信你会读的。(类似于“者”zhe的发音)。在快速的语流中,往往会发生音变,/djə/会发成/dʒə/.例如快速的语流中,student['stjuːdnt] 会发成[...
回答于 1秒前
I like the book very much. I like very much the book you gave me. I very much like the book you gave me. I would like very much to thank you. I would very much like to thank you. 书上的以上句子都是正确的。very much作为程度状语可以修饰有程度差别的动词。通常的位置是动词之后,如果动词为及物动词,...
回答于 1秒前
1 shall用作时态助动词为英式英语,用于第一人称主语。美式英语一律用will。2 你没见过get ready这种用法??get在此为系词。be ready中,be为静态系词。get ready中,get为动态系词。
回答于 1秒前
认为no more...than...不等于not more...than...并非中国人的创造或编译错误,这是夸克的观点。以下为夸克的《大全》的论述,观点明确,毫不含糊:15.70 When more is a determinative or a head of a noun phrase - functions (i) and(ii) in 15.69 - the unit no more ( . . . ) than is synonymous with only as m...
回答于 1秒前
Such inns as there were were generally dirty and flea-ridden; the food (was) simply local cheese accompanied by bread often twelve months old, all washed down with coarse wine. 分号相当于并列连词。二个并列分句都是主系表结构,则书面语中第二个分句的系词可以省略,所以the food后省略了系词was. 第一个划线...
回答于 1秒前
没有必要这么苛求。等你见到了,你就知道了。我造一个句子:Saving money is preparing for the future. 存钱就是为将来做准备。Giving a child too much money is spoiling him.
回答于 1秒前
宾语和宾语补足语之间存在逻辑上的主谓关系。如果不定式作宾补而用to do的形式,宾语与宾补之间必须是主动的主谓关系。如果宾语与宾补是被动关系,则应当用不定式的被动形式。例如:I asked him to help me. He wanted the letter (to be) retyped. 不定式作定语则不然,被修...
回答于 1秒前
’s属格也可以表示动宾关系。如: The rich man's murder by john shocked everyone.那个富人被约翰谋杀的事使所有人感到震惊。’s属格和of结构都可以既表示主谓关系,也可以表示动宾关系,需要根据上下文及逻辑做出判断。如:The rich man's murder of John. 主谓关系The rich man's murder by John 动宾关系 ...
回答于 1秒前