Falstaff might have rendered more romance to the ton than would have Romeo's rickety ribs to the ounce.render=present,perform。render romance=搞风流事to the ton=to great a mount 在本句表示程度之高to the ounce= to very small amout 在本句表示程度than比较分句为倒装结构,还原正常语序为:Falstaff mi...
回答于 1秒前
我替这位网友问一个问题,哪位老师愿意解答一下。不定式作定语可以表示动状关系,即被修饰名词是不定式动作的状语。例如:I found a nice place to live. place在逻辑上是to live的地点状语。This is the best way to study English. way是to study English的方式状语。既然不定式作定语与被修饰名词可以是动状关系,那么sc...
回答于 1秒前
错误在逻辑。she doesn't want to work. 工作是将来的事。如果她工作,也是假设她将来动作,所以if从句虚拟语气用were to do表示将来。而不是假设她过去如何。你把had got改为had get 就成了不可饶恕的语法错误了。英语没有这种had+动词原型的结构的。
回答于 1秒前
She was a large woman with a large purse that had everything in it but hammer and nails.that从句修饰a large purse。He fell on his back on the sidewalk,and his legs ...
回答于 1秒前
It is not as you saw.至于as是什么词类,词典和语法书都说是连词。至于as是否作成分,《剑桥语法》认为as没有作成分。当主句没有as+形容词/分词,也没有the same, such时,as本身含有比较项,而as分句仍然需要留出空位gap(即必须省略的成分)。所以,It is not as you say .这就看...
回答于 1秒前
你的句子开头没大写,后面没句号。假定你给的是完整的句子,即:The mobile phone use will not cause the same disturbance in public areas as smokers smoke.那么这个句子后面的as smokers smoke为错误。应改为:The mobile phone use will not cause the same disturbance in public areas as smok...
回答于 1秒前
Judging from what you said, 为现在分词短语作评注性状语。非谓语动词作评注性状语,其逻辑主语为说话人。说话人与judge这个动作为主动关系,所以要用现在分词,不能用过去分词。judge的动作略先于后面的句子,表示原因,所以用现在分词而不用不定式。不定式作评注性状语带有目的意义,例如to begin with, to tell you the...
回答于 1秒前
I have——I‘veHe is/has——He’swe will——we'lllet us——let'sis not——isn't... ...
回答于 1秒前