shoud be sent:应该寄去(指“将来”)。shoud have been sent:本应该寄去,而实际未寄去(指“过去”)。结合以上解释,看看句子需要填哪个,才合乎句意?
回答于 1秒前
教给网友一个办法:有时候,为了弄清句子结构,可以把原句作必要改动:I am the only crature to live alone.这时,网友自己分析一下:to live alone 是不是作定语?
回答于 1秒前
两种写法都对,没有区别。不过,网友这个例子,指的是“日元”而且数目太大。我用美元举个例子:“100 美元价值的商品”。在经济、贸易和金融界,加上各种媒体,使用这个这种表达的场合非常多,由于用得太频繁,因此就出现了多种表达,非常灵活。由于不会产生歧义,人们也逐渐认可。“100 美元价值的商品”——翻译成英语,可以是:...
回答于 1秒前
It's my sincere hope that the items at the donation centers will find new owners for whom they will truly spark joy.【翻译】我衷心希望捐赠中心的捐赠品能够找到新的主人,为他们带来真正的欢乐。网友理解正确。that the items at the donation centers will find new owners for whom they will truly spark j...
回答于 1秒前
put astronauts in orbit关于介词短语作“状语”,还是作“宾补”的问题,我认为:如果两者都能讲得通,就按“状语”处理,不按“宾补”对待。因为英语中,这类模凌两可的情况较多,即:看作修饰动词也可,看作补充宾语也可。这时,就把它划到状语里面,似更合理。例如:put/place/lay the book on the deskwrite your name on the...
回答于 1秒前
Five thousand 在本句意思是“5000人”,等于说:Five thousand people。谓语动词用复数:Five thousand were sent to the front. 若单纯指“数字”,即把five thousand 看作一个数字的话,则是单数意义。如:Five thousand is a big number.
回答于 1秒前
用taking 不正确,应该使用原形动词take,表达一个祈使语气。相当于let's take 之意。To explain the above phenomenon clearly, (let's)take two testing samples (MC-15.2%-1.59 and SC-15.2%-1.85) as an example.
回答于 1秒前
He didn't wait until I returned. (“等待“从“我回来”后才开始)I won't be there until Sunday. (状态到星期天才开始)以上两句,括号中的解释部分,都有问题,或者都不严谨。分析如下:第一句有两层意思,曹老师已经解答了。但括号中只说了一种,另外一层意思是:“他没有等到我回来(就不等了)。”第二句在描述...
回答于 1秒前
网友理解有误。这不是同位语从句,而是定语从句:that we expect a definition of torture to answer,修饰one question。关系代词that 作answer 的宾语。One question that we expect a definition of torture to answer is how to draw the line between forms of coercive interrogation that are legitimate under extr...
回答于 1秒前
The justification for this is the Silicon Valley doctrine of "blitzscaling" in order to conquer "winner-takes-all" markets—or in plain English, conducting a high speed land grab in the hope of finding gold.【翻译】这样做的理由是硅谷的“闪电式扩张”原则,目的是征服“赢家通吃”的市场,...
回答于 1秒前