after 和 when 表示的时间,在有些情况下,意思是一致的。本句把when 换成 after 完全可以,都表示“在...之后”。after 表示“之后”,不存在间隔一段时间,只表示“先后”,不表示“间隔”。在一个复合句中,如果主句和从句的谓语动词都是“终止性动词”,从句的动作发生在先,这时,用when 或after 均可,意思几乎没有差别。例如:...
回答于 1秒前
第一问,是因为shows 的宾语太长而被前置。其次,也是为了突出宾语从句的内容。宾语前置,可以是单词、短语,从句。又如:Few friends your new girlfriend has besides me. Where or how this happened, no one knows exactly.第二问,work the third most hours中,work 是不及物动词,the third most hours 是名词短语作...
回答于 1秒前
儿歌或童谣的特点是:精炼押韵,朗朗上口,便于背诵。网友提供的这几个句子,便体现了这个特点。句尾是三个[ent]:went, went, sent, 旨在为押韵。这三个句子,都不是“倒装句”。因为主谓倒装才是真正的倒装,倒装句的前提条件是:谓语的全部或者谓语的一部分提到主语之前(“谓语的一部分”是指:助动词或情态动词放在主语之...
回答于 1秒前
网友句子不完整。应为:A war demands of us enormous sacrifices of lives and property.demand 是及物动词,后接单宾语或宾语从句。不直接跟表示人的词语作宾语,而须用from或of 短语引出。其结构是:demand sth. of sb. ; demand sth. from sb. 它的变式是:demand of sb. sth. ; demand from sb. s...
回答于 1秒前
网友写句子,为何不注意人称,也不注意时态?这不是小问题,而是大问题!She equip with knowledge for the vocation.前一个问题,也是出错:I don’t lay down so much to sleep as to think.应为:I didn't lie down...
回答于 1秒前
句子开头应该是:I was told...主句是转述类动词(told),虽然是一般过去时,从句也可以使用现在时间或将来时间范畴的时态。又因为 next week 尚未来到,所以,使用are/is going to send 是允许的。shall 表将来,仅限于第一人称 I 和 we。其他人称用 shall 不表示将来,而是“义务”或其他意思。由于 the company 是第三人...
回答于 1秒前
Bin Li is as close as China may have come to cloning Elon Musk. 主句和比较从句共用了一个介词短语:to cloning Elon Musk。这是承后省略。正常语序为:Bin Li is as close to cloning Elon Musk as China may have come (to cloning Elon Musk). 主要结构:be close to doing :最接近做某事比较结构:He...
回答于 1秒前
Applicants are required to have a degree in dance area, teaching experience at a professional or college level, ability to direct and teach stage movement.直观分析:Applicants (主语)are required (谓语动词)to have a degree in dance area, teaching experience at a professional or colleg...
回答于 1秒前
Their table would be graced by pieces of aubergine the size of an index finger, fried and dusted with cumin.是的,网友判断正确。划线部分是名词性词组,作 pieces of aubergine 的定语。等于说:Their table would be graced by pieces of aubergine which are the size of an index finger, fried and dusted with...
回答于 1秒前