With America, caught up in a trade war with China, there is a risk that Hong Kong becomes the focus of a great-power clash.1. caught up in a trade war with China 的逻辑主语是America,过去分词表示被动关系,意思是说“美国被卷入了与中国的贸易战”。这个逗号是多余的,应删去。2. With America caught up in a...
回答于 1秒前
情态动词可以用于分裂句中(强调句),在强调的前提下让be 具有情态意义,这样可以强化或弱化be 的意义,甚至否定它。例如:It might have been John that bought a new book for Mary yesterday.(弱化)It may be next week that she leaves for Tokyo.(弱化)It mast have been a thief that broke in the house.(强化...
回答于 1秒前
To inflict harm or damage on someone or something means to make them suffer it.例如:Rebels say they have inflicted heavy casualties on government forces.反叛武装称他们使政府军遭受重创。介词on 含有“强加于;施加于”之意,让对方不情愿地接受。此句不能用to。关于on 表示“强加于;施加于” 的例句:The police...
回答于 1秒前
absent amongabsent from区别就在这两个介词上。前者表示 “不在...之列”;后者表示 “缺席;没参加”。具体说来,前者说明主语不在同类事物之中,同类事物中没有它;后者说明主语缺席某个活动,如此人没有参加或出席会议、聚会、上课或其他活动。
回答于 1秒前
some, many, much 等词,既可以作限定词(量概念),也可以用作代词。用作代词时,后面还可以接of 短语作定语。of 后面的名词需要特指,需要加定冠词。例如:some bookssome of the booksmuch controlmuch of the control网友给的much of control 这个例子,不符合语法规则。请给出具体出处。
回答于 1秒前
一、我先讲一个问题:Bill said that he didn’t like the party, and he wanted to go home right away. 有的语法书认为:用 and 连接的两个宾语从句,只在第一个宾语从句前用了引导词 that,第二宾语从句前的引导词 that 则被省略。这个说法有误。这不是省略 that,而是不能用 that。用that 毫无道理。这实际上是:一...
回答于 1秒前
a piece of meat with hair on it划线部分,是 with 复合结构。it 必须有,指“在那块肉上面”。没有 it 表示“佩戴,穿着”。例如:The boy with a cap on is coming.
回答于 1秒前
动词原形是 rebel,不是 rebell。rebel 是不及物动词,需要一个介词才能引出宾语。它只表示 “反叛,反抗,造反;抗命”,其对立面、对手由 against 引出。这样的例子举不胜举:fight (不及物) + againststruggle (不及物)+ againstcompete (不及物)+ against
回答于 1秒前
1. It's impossible to overestimate the influence (that) Stanley Ho had in Macau and Hong Kong. 2. Ho's fortunes were tightly linked with the growth of Macau from a small fishing town to a wealth gambling centre. 第一句,划线部分显然是定语从句,省略了在从句作宾语的关系代词...
回答于 1秒前