15596 个回答
英语句式分析
这是BBC新闻的听写稿。听写者自己没有听清楚，就胡乱写了这个错误的句子。首先这句话是记者没有稿子随口说的，可能有口误。例如fires is就明显的口误。句子应该是这样的：Fires're here is they're wind-driven a lot of the time. 这是口语，不规范。The reason fires are here is that they are wind-driven a lo...
回答于 1秒前
I could not quite place him的翻译
《韦氏高阶》place及物用法之一释义和例句：8 [+ object] : to remember where you saw (someone or someone's face) in the pastThe man looked familiar but she couldn't quite place him.It wasn't until later that I placed her face: she was my ninth grade Englis...
回答于 1秒前
存在句改写，以及should用法含义理解困惑
1 There will be people anxious that the plan should succeed.划线部分为形容词短语作定语修饰people。其中that从句为形容词的补足语。此句可以改写为下句，意义相同，但不如原句简洁：There will be people (who are ) anxious that the plan should succeed. 这是there存在句。英语句子除了有语法结构外，还...
回答于 1秒前
can't be 和 can't have been 有什么区别?
There can't have been so many people in the street so late at night. 推测过去的情况。There can't be so many people in the street so late at night.推测现在的情况。
回答于 1秒前
此处reassured是什么状语？
reassured为sent谓语动作发生时宾语的状态，所以是形容词作与宾语有关的伴随状语。句子逻辑意义为：When we sent her home, she was reassured.
回答于 1秒前
have sth done之类的短语
have sth left中，left不是定语，而是宾补。在 All (that) we have left中，省略的关系代词that为宾语，left为宾补。并不存在你所说的分隔式定语。
回答于 1秒前
for sb to do sth有没有可能是介词短语而不是不定式复合结构
for sb to do sth中的for本身就是介词，只不过重新分析为引出不定式的逻辑主语的引导词。所以不再按照介词短语分析。例如：I'm waiting for Tom. for Tom为介词短语作目的状语。I‘m waiting for Tom to come. for Tom to come为不定式复合结构作目的状语。而不再是介词短语作目的状语。
回答于 1秒前
句首强调和句尾重心
找一本现代语法的书，翻到后面，关于倒装、前置、后移、信息中心、尾重原则。你看一下就都清楚了。老师在这里不可能给你一下子讲清楚，要么就得抄书了。不如你自己看，既然你对此感兴趣的话。绝对比老师的解答更准确。
回答于 1秒前