找到约 60000 条结果

问题 主谓一致(dramatics作主语)

The play was well written, but the dramatics of the performance (were/was ) Second-rate. 《张振邦英语语法教程》答案是were/was。不是说dramatics表“学科”以外其他意义就做复数,怎么还was呢?谢谢老师!

问题 fuzzy 还是 fuzzily

... the significance or emotion or mood around that event?我想这句话中单词fuzzy应该是修饰remembering,不是修饰something,所以这里应该使副词形式fuzzily,请问我想法有没有错误?

问题 more than, less than ,more...t

请专家讲讲有没有好简单易行办法可以分清初,一下几个含有than 短语:more than, less than ,more...than, less…than, not more than, no more than, no less than等等结构

问题 ills 应该译为“疾病”还是“困难”

Science and technology would cure all the ills of humanity, leading to lives of fulfilment and opportunity for all.请问这里 all the ills 应该译为“所有疾病”,还是“所有困难”?谢谢老师!

问题 stand out rigid是什么意思

Muscle stands out rigid and ready for the fatal spring. 这里stand out rigid理解不了,难道是突出刚性

问题 句子成分分析

...am killing myself trying to get this program off the ground.我拼死拼活试图让这个项目起步。请问老师,我在这句子理解上有困惑,这里现在分词作是什么种类状语,伴随还是原因?“我拼死拼活”是否是因为“想让项目起步”?还...

问题 如何找到外网资料来学习英语

听说现在高考英语命题选材料都是国外网站文章,但同时听说要看外网文章要“翻墙”才行?请问什么是“翻墙”?求大侠指点!谢谢您!

问题 副词little含义理解和法?

They tried to look as little like authors as possible.这里副词little,是修饰介词词组like authors?这里副词little可否理解为not much, 就是这里little含否定含义,“几乎不”或“很少”意思?

问题 句子成分

尊敬各位老师,这一段中In this individual assignment, you will analyze the solution your group proposes [to the problem you identified in Assignment 1] by writing a report that focusses on your solution [through a specific lens.]    括号里内容是做什么成分,又是修饰...

问题 句子理解

... as 11th century.我理解这句话几个问题:1.我查词典里介词with词条解释似乎都不适合这里,请教这里with含义,请写出中文和英文含义解释。2.我不理解这里为什么使instrction,也是感觉词典里词条解释都不适合这里语境。

问题 介词短语修饰对象

...f Washington has now found the answer. 一支由Eli Shlizerman 教授领导来自华盛顿大学科学家团队现已找到了答案。  请问这句话中at短语修饰是A team of scientists还是Professor EIi Shlizerman?如何判断?

文章 than he would have liked

这个来自昨天晚上《泰晤士报》,我认为would have liked是虚拟语气表愿望法,而不是假设或和事实相反法,虚拟语气可以表示和事实相反、假设和愿望

问题 see sb do与see sb doing

...kes they see women making with their hair.我感觉这句话中使making分词形式不合适,因为单词see法中:看到某人或是某物在做什么,都是see后跟不带to不定式,所以我认为这里造句形式应该是…they see women make with their hair。而...

问题 invite sb to sth与invite sb to do sth

We have been invited _____ this Friday.A. to dinner B. for a dinner C. for dining D. to dine是否AD都是可以,如果都可以话,两个句子成分应该是不太一样,是否可以分析一下成分呢?不清楚成分还是容易搞混。

问题 实意动词还是实义动词?

刚才提到了一个问题:不知道反意疑问句和反义疑问句哪个是正确表达,突然又想到另一组表达:实意动词和实义动词。这两种表达也经常混,书上写法也不一致,不知道哪个是最地道说法!