网友的句子有误:of 应改为to。We don't even know the extent to which that sort of covert influence in other countries domestic politics has gone on.【翻译】我们甚至不知道这种对其他国家国内政治的隐性影响程度有多大。which 之前加to,是因为先行词是the extent(to the extent 到达那种程度)的缘故。把to...
回答于 1秒前
根据网友提问的意思,我用划线表示两个句子:1. She is fond of coffee being served after dinner.2. She is fond of coffee being served after dinner.句1,按照“动名词复合结构”理解句意,正确。“动名词复合结构” 实际是“含有逻辑主语的动名词短语”,它表达的是一个“主谓事件” (逻辑上的主谓关系)。含义是:“她喜欢饭...
回答于 1秒前
网友不可以这样理解问题。这是possible 作定语而后置。possible 作后置定语,正好符合以下条件:以-able 和-ible 后缀结尾的形容词:可置于前有最高级或only 等词的名词之后。这里说的可以后置,也可以不后置。但是,the most wood possible 必须后置,因为前面的most 本来修饰wood,如果把possible 放在most 之后,可能产...
回答于 1秒前
答案是否定的,网友的例句便是。如果变成主动语态,把时间状语提至句首,就可以修正这种情况:In only the last several years shoe companies have made many design advances that make an excellent running shoe indispensable. 关系代词that 指代前文advances,也就是说advances 是先行词。这是先行词和定语...
回答于 1秒前
简单解答这个问题。介词起“中介作用”。选用什么介词与前后两个名词的词义、性质有关。我没查词典,但我的感觉是:用 with, in, on 可以,at 不可以。语义略有差别:achievement with this job (with 表示“从事;涉及”)从事这项工作所取得的成就achievement in this job (in 表示“在...中;在...方面”)在这项工作中所取...
回答于 1秒前
Each participant was shown a pile of pens that the researcher claimed were from a previous experiment.这个句子很完整,不缺成分。整个红色划线部分是 pens 的定语从句,that 是关系代词,本身作定语从句的主语。而划线部分是插入定语从句的一个“主谓”结构,叫做“嵌入式定语从句”,意思是说:这个主谓结构嵌入了...
回答于 1秒前
The new boots are lighter and softer, and therefore more comfortable to wear.We were unable to get funding and therefore had to abandon the project.以上两句都是 and 连接的并列句,前后是两个并列分句,第二分句省略了主语。我认为,判断 and 是否连接并列句的标准,符合下面任意一个,则是并列句:1. 两个分句...
回答于 1秒前
建议网友把下面这段文字忘掉即可(基本没有多大意义):Albert Einstein, the great American scientist, is estimated to have had the incredible intelligence quotient of 200.“……但是爱因斯坦已故去,所以他“有”这样的智商已成为过去,因此要用完成式to have had来精确表达这个过去的时间,即不定式时间在谓...
回答于 1秒前
but rather just kind of says... 这里面有好几个语法知识点:1. kind of 副词词组,修饰动词。意为“有点;有几分”。例如: I kind of miss my family. 我有点思念我的家人。2. just 是个“强调副词”,与 only 相当。修饰 kind of,意为“只是有点”。3. rather:是对前文所描述情况的修正。意为“更确切地说...
回答于 1秒前