网友的提问不够准确,并没有问到问题的核心。动态动词这个术语使用不当,应该是短暂终结性动词。题目应该是这样的:短暂终结性动词与for时间状语连用的问题。然后给你的问题内容再加一个句子:1 He went to Beijing for 2 weeks.2 It stopped raining for a while,but now it is raining again.3 I lost...
回答于 1秒前
She has been absent again, as is expected.1 as引导的是比较分句,不是定语从句。as的语义为“正如...那样”。其后省略了形式主语it和位置的that从句。补全后为:She has been absent again, as it is expected that she has. 本句的逻辑为,主句表述的事实A,和人们所期待的可能会发生的事件B是一致的。as并没有指代...
回答于 1秒前
原句没有and !They registered themselves thus after being allotted farmland by a former government of the state of Uttar Pradesh, led by the Samajwadi party.
回答于 1秒前
close是形容词和副词,不是介词要表示接近什么地方,就需要通过介词to. near本是形容词和副词,也需要通过介词to后接名词表示在什么地方的附近。但在语言演变中near后的介词to常被省略,直接接名词,于是near兼具了介词的词性,但仍保留了形容词可以有比较级、最高级的特征。所以,near+名词或near to+名词都是可以的。例如...
回答于 1秒前
He is a good man to be worked with by people. 错误work为不及物动词,with为介词,二者不是短语动词,不可用被动语态。形容词good 作表语名词的定语,该名词又被不定式后置修饰时,后接的不定式要用悬空不定式(或叫做反射不定式),即该名词在逻辑上为不定式的宾语或不定式短语中的某个介词的宾语。该不定式缺失动...
回答于 1秒前
exactly强调哪个词,就置于哪个词之前。所以,exactly并不是修饰动词,而是强调the best place.
回答于 1秒前
I was shocked that she shouldn't have invited Phyllis.I was shocked that she didn't invited Phyllis.第二句中的didn't invited可以改为hadn't invited。should在此表示“竟然、居然”这种难以置信、不可思议的感情色彩,传统语法认为这种should属于虚拟语气用法,它表示说话人不愿意相信从句表示的内容...
回答于 1秒前
and make him what, unaided, he could never be.unaided为插入性状语。形容词作状语表示谓语动作发生时,主语所处的状语。本句中unaided是一种假设的状态,相当于if he were unaided。所以he could never be用了虚拟语气。what, unaided, he could never be 为make的宾补。what=the person that.
回答于 1秒前
你的问题的前面部分已经讲得非常清楚,你怎么不理解呢?一个名词词组由限定词+(形容词)+中心词(名词)构成。限定词自然要位于中心词之前,这要需要特别说明吗?所有的限定词都位于中心名词之前!!!!!!!double(前位限定词)+the(中位限定词)+sum (中心词)。
回答于 1秒前
二个being...都是动名词短语,并列作表语。The thing which stands out the most is being there and being able to do sth. 最为突出的就是A和B。
回答于 1秒前