可以的。这种否定叫做局部否定。例如:I did it, but not for you. 我作了那件事,但不是为了你。局部否定其实是省略了重复的句子成分。例如上句如果不省略则为:I did it, but I didn't do it for you.又如:I like Tom, (but) not you. = I like Tom, (but) I don't like you.
回答于 1秒前
not unnaturally是一个短语副词,词典有收录。《麦克米伦词典》的解释和例句如下:phrase 短语used for saying that someone’s behaviour was what could normally be expected in that situation 用来表示某人的行为在当时情况下的是预料之中的。可以翻译为理所当然地...
回答于 1秒前
D's and F's 并列的复数名词词组作主语 predominate 不及物动词作谓语。D、F 为英语国家学校对学生考试成绩的打分,共有A、B、C、D、E、F。D和F均为很差的成绩,相当于我国的不及格。D‘s 和 F’s 分别为字母D 和 F 的复数形式。即很多的D和很多的F。复数的主语并列,故谓语predominate也是复数形式。put sb on acade...
回答于 1秒前
a fact that points to the urgency of catching and treating depression early in life with depression have a wide varity of symptoms sometimes making it hard to diagnose.请网友核对原文。以上部分显然是错误的。逻辑不通,语法错误。陈老师据此作翻译,逻辑不错才怪呢。points怎么能是have的主语???怎么能随便...
回答于 1秒前
理解这个句子的关键是判断illustrating对逻辑主语。通过逻辑分析可知,现在分词的逻辑主语显然是主语 Fig. 1B, 那么分句短语就是伴随状语,不是定语。分词短语放在句首也是可以的。仍然是伴随状语。如果分词短语插入主语和系词之间,用逗号隔开,则这个分词短语既可以分析为状语,也可以分析为主语的非限制性定语。FIG. 1B...
回答于 1秒前
网友在抄录例句的时候要仔细核对原文。有二处错误,我已改正。In confirmation of this, she related the particulars of all the pecuniary transitions in which they had been connected, without actually naming her authority, but stating it to be such as might be relied on.it指代authority。such为代词作to be...
回答于 1秒前
网友要注意一个概念:动名词虽然可以作名词性的成分例如主语、宾语等,但动名词本身还是动词,可以有宾语,被副词修饰。一个动名词带有状语从句也是很自然的事。所以,下面这个句子中,作主语的并不是网友认为的“一个名词+从句”,而是动名词短语作主语。Finishing a painting before the plaster dried was a real challeng...
回答于 1秒前
The thing主语 that is so good about the box you have given me定语从句 is 系词 that at night he can use it as his house表语从句.= What is so good about the box you have given me 主语从句 is 系词 that at night he can use it as his house 表语从句.
回答于 1秒前
Whether the Government should increase the financing of pure science at the expense of technology or vice versa often depends on the issue of which is seen as the driving force.is seen as the driving force需要主语,所以which是is seen的主语,而不是介词of的宾语。所以这是of后接名词性从句作宾语,which为...
回答于 1秒前