What will be is entirely in what has been. 未来是不等人的。这个句子的二个what从句都是名词性关系分句。从句不缺成分。二个句子中的be都是不及物动词。字面的意思为:将来会存在的事物现在就存在于已经存在的事物之中。
回答于 1秒前
in addition to sth是修饰谓语动词的,不是修饰名词的。所以是状语,不是定语。这个介词短语可以位于句首,意义不变,由此可知它不是定语。
回答于 1秒前
Here I was, way past midnight, face to face with a situation that could very well become an incident of prejudice and chauvinism caused by the unjust policy of our society today.here i was为表语前置,here为表语。way past midnight为时间状语,face to face with...为副词+介词构成的副词短语。face to face...
回答于 1秒前
静态动词表示的转态没有结束意义。即使用了过去分词形式,也仅仅表示被动意义,并不表示结束。所以,静态动词的过去分词本身就表示的是被动/同时双重意义,根本没有必要用现在分词被动语态来表示被动/同时这种双重意义,即现在分词被动语态仅限于动态动词使用。用在静态动词是画蛇添足,多此一举。Being liked by all the s...
回答于 1秒前
including as subsets within it academic and nonacademic components.= including academic and nonacademic components as subsets within it including为现在分词,后接宾语academic and nonacademic components 和as介词短语作方式状语。由于宾语比较长或者为了突出宾语,将宾语后移到状语之后,这种现象称为宾语后移...
回答于 1秒前
who (having it in his power to make known the place where at this time the enormity was practicing or about to be practiced, ) should refuse to do so?who和谓语should refuse之间,插入了现在分词短语作条件状语。which (if inflicted by the hand of justice, ) would universally be spoken of under the...
回答于 1秒前
我也凑个热闹。我觉得作者a thumbdrive-throw away 是根据 a stone's throw away杜撰而来的。这是个副词短语,中心词是away,表示距离很近。由距离引申为时间,很快就会发生/出现。所以不定冠词的使用与主语的单复数无关。a stone's throw away指一个人扔石块所能扔出的距离,一般人能扔30-50米。所以这个短语用来...
回答于 1秒前
What kind of families usually have two cars?Those with both parents in employment.这是中国人写的句子。原句有二处错误:family应为families,of 应为 with。those为替代词,替代前面出现过的复数名词。在此为替代 the families。The families with both parents in employment (usually have two cars).
回答于 1秒前
otherwise并非总是用在句首或句末,经常也用在句中。如以下词典例句:He was slightly bruised but otherwise unhurt.I wanted to see him but he was otherwise engaged (= doing something else).
回答于 1秒前