15621 个回答
Not much more than two months later 究竟是什么意思
not much=a little, 修饰more than. not much more than two months = a little more than two months, 二个月多一点。
回答于 2021-05-05 22:04
为什么定语从句里要用情态助动词would
you would expect 中的 would 为推测性用法。类似的用法如，He would come tomorrow. 比 He will come tomorrow.显得委婉，说话留有一定余地。
回答于 2021-05-05 21:56
同位语从句的使用
the bailout program can resolve the debt crisis 为省略了关系副词that的定语从句，不是同位语从句。
回答于 2021-05-05 21:50
这里的I thought是表示虚拟语气吗
1 I thought they'd like to hear what you had to say about their father. thought在此为表示委婉口气，比用think显得更为婉转。would like to do sth也是委婉说法，很少用will like to do sth. what you had to say是因为时态一致的原因，与主句的过去时thought保持一致。2 She must have been the same age as was he...
回答于 2021-05-05 21:46
so little做表语
little在此为副词，大约等于hardly，almost never. 句子意思为，某人几乎是不可信赖的。句子是be to do结构，不定式用了被动语态。so little为副词，表示否定意义。
回答于 2021-05-05 21:01
sat不及物动词为什么会有宾语his household呢
I suspected that for the figures had sat his household ... that为指示代词，指代前句内容，for为并列连词连接并列分句。had sat 在此为及物动词，= to baby-sit for 给某人看小孩。等于 sit for.
回答于 2021-05-05 20:51
这里为什么不能加be
因为形容词可以直接作宾补，所以当一个动词需要后接现在分词或不带to的不定式作宾补时，当这个being或be为系词时，being或be就必须省略。例如：My son is back. I am happy that I have my son be/being back. 错误，改为：I am happy that I have my son back, 又如： I found the room being empty. 错误，改为 I found t...
回答于 2021-05-05 18:30
为什么是of不是with
Sb is in possession of sth. 某人拥有、占有某物。Sth is in the possesioon of sb. 某物被某人所持有或占有。possession在此具有动词的意义，of在二个句子中分别表示动宾关系和主谓关系。这里不能用with。
回答于 2021-05-05 18:12
关于先行词是副词或者形容词到底怎么翻译
你的问题似乎不是形容词或副词是否可以后接定语从句，而是形容词或副词最高级被定语从句修饰后的翻译问题。首先你应该知道，最高级通常需要一个比较范围，没有一个比较范围，你说的话可能让人费解或者不符合实情。例如，你说一个1米8的男孩是最高的。Tom is 1.8 metres and he is the tallest. 我听你说这句话就会觉得费解...
回答于 2021-05-05 16:07
as many times as引导的是让步状语从句吗
(as) many times as I zoomed across the lawn after that, I never again crashed into that tree.这是美式英语, as引导让步状语从句，如果前置于as前的词项为形容词、副词或many/much是，美式英语常可以在形容词、副词、many/much前加as。= Many times as I zoomed across the lawn after that, I never again crashed in...
回答于 2021-05-05 11:52