你的句子是错误的。错误的原因是逻辑上的。逗号后部分与difference是同位关系,而不是修饰关系。不该用定语从句,而应该用同位关系的表示方法,例如用冒号或用that is (to say)之类。We should take the difference between Chinese and English into full consideration:the former is connotative and th...
回答于 1秒前
蒋老师解释的非常好。下面为COCA语料库类似例句:Can you explain how this round differs in the speed it travels as compared to a.40 caliber round? Given the volume of information and the speed it travels, the job has become vital to achieving the Pentag...
回答于 1秒前
是的,主句是maybe it's not all doom and gloom。划线部分整体是一个when引导的时间状语从句。其中as引导的时间从句为we're going to face这个定语从句的时间从句,和when从句不在一个层次上,不可把二者相提并论。所以,这个句子结构为when从句+主句。
回答于 1秒前
recently作时间状语,英式英语多用现在完成时,美式英语多用一般过去时。受美式英语的影响,现在英式英语非正式语体用一般过去时也较为常见。
回答于 1秒前
what引导名词性关系分句,在主句中作表语,不是方式状语。to the plants和to the animals分别为主句和从句的状语。答疑网有过很多类似提问,你可搜索阅读。其实这种句子已经成了一种固定格式,没有必要再分析成分,能够理解句意、会模仿使用就可以了。不要自找麻烦。
回答于 1秒前
And whereas his was once a lonely if plummy voice crying in the wilderness, the Prince has seen many of his once maverick opinions become mainstream. 你对句子结构理解错误。if plummy是补充语(你可以理解为插入语),是形容词lonely作补充说明。His was a lonely voice. 他的声音是孤独的声音。加上补充语...
回答于 1秒前
the Cox brothers employed a conscientious ghost that did most of their work for them.that did most of their work for them是定语从句。修饰ghost。that在意义上指代ghost,并在从句作主语。关系代词在定语从句中作主语,只有一下几种情况在非正式语体可以省略关系代词。1 从句修饰there be句型中的真正主语时: ...
回答于 1秒前