15598 个回答
taken away this week to much bleating.怎么理解
...enjoy protected benefits, such as free access to the BBC, taken away this week to much bleating.taken away this week to much bleating.为过去分词短语作非限制性定语，修饰 the BBC.享受一些受保护的权益，例如免费收听/收看BBC（本周令人悲哀地被屏蔽）。
回答于 1秒前
as的词性判断(In parenting as in sports）
In parenting as in sports, it unsettles the gifted dimension of human experience.= In parenting, it unsettles the gifted dimension of human experience, as it does in sports. as引导省略成分的比较分句，意为像...一样。.
回答于 1秒前
关于however后边的句子成分问题
however为连接副词，作连接性状语，在意义上（不是语法上）将二个句子连接起来。通常，连接性状语位于句首，后面用逗号隔开。但连接性状语也可以插入句中，甚至位于句末。本句中however插入句中。表示本句和前面的一个句子是转折关系。你把however移至句首，这个句子就好理解了：However，the cavalry (which was then in t...
回答于 1秒前
短文中的could have done, I didn't think等句型分析含义
(1) “You could have knocked him down with a feather.” 中could have done为虚拟语气，可以认为省略了一个if虚拟条件从句：if you had tried to do so. 不可改用一般过去时 You knocked him down with a feather ，因为一般过去时表示过去的事实，意思就成了“某人曾用一根羽毛将他击倒了”。 (2) “ I didn'...
回答于 1秒前
like it if... / like it when...还是宾语从句吗
like it if/when...结构中，it为人称代词前照应指代作宾语，it指代后面状语从句的内容。从句仍然是状语从句。pretend A as B. as B合起来分析为宾补。不是双宾语结构，而是复合宾语结构。
回答于 1秒前
start 作受惊含义时只能用作不及物动词吗
把下面二个句子连起来读： I wonder what started him so suddenly ?Could it have been hunger that made desperate, or was he frieightened by something in the night ?第二句的it 指代第一句中的what, 即start him的主语。老人自问：是饥饿呢还是受了惊吓？由此可知，it指代what, 而what是started的主语，it可能...
回答于 1秒前
already 用于否定句的疑问(2019全国卷)
这个句子是双重否定：不需要人们还不熟悉的技术。实际表达的是肯定意义：需要的就是人们已经熟悉的技术。所以用了肯定词already。通常already用于肯定句，yet用于疑问或否定句。但already也可用于疑问句，表示期待一个肯定的回答。例如：Has he finished yet? 说话人对是否完成持中立态度，需要听话人给出答案。Has he alre...
回答于 1秒前