That 主语 hands 双宾语及物动词 a small number of coders间接宾语, tweaking the algorithms that determine who sees whom across the virtual bar非限制性定语, tremendous power to engineer mating outcomes直接宾语. 现在分词作定语之所以前后用逗号隔开,是为了使双宾语结构清晰可辨,避免误读。
回答于 1秒前
First and foremost, it is in the group discussion and exchange that we students can have a thorough idea what our peers are reading for the moment, serving as a driving force for our own reading journey.what从句为间接疑问句,作idea的同位语,疑问词what在从句中作宾语。what从句前省...
回答于 1秒前
《韦氏高级词典》介词over 14 — used to describe something that is done while some activity (such as a meal) is taking placeI plan to meet with my advisers over lunch. [=while we eat lunch together]你的句子中over就是这种用法。
回答于 1秒前
不可以。offer在此等于give。主语he可能说了”对不起,我考虑不够周到,设计不够严密,材料选择也不合适...". 说这些话,并不是在找借口。这时,另一个人评论说,He is offering no excuses...这就好比你听到一个人在撒谎,你对周围的人说:Don't trust him. He is lying. 而不是说,Don't trust him. He lies....
回答于 1秒前
所有的人只要报考这所重点大学,就都被录取,这不符合逻辑。句子应该改为过去时态,按照过去事件意义去理解才是合理的。这是中国人造的句子,只考虑了主谓一致,忽略了逻辑。There was no one but succeeded in being admitted into the key university.
回答于 1秒前
Ages for Earth were derived that were in the tens of millions of years, much less than the geologic estimates of the lime.你的分析是错误的。for后面并不是一个句子,而只是名词Earth。ages for Earth即地球的年龄。地球的年龄为什么要用复数呢?因为谁也不知道地球的准确的年龄,大家有不同的猜测,所以地球...
回答于 1秒前
这个问题其实就是用动名词还是不定式作主语的问题。Knowing who to trust is valuable.To know who to trust is valuable.由于valuable在此 = very useful or important, 而这二个形容词通常用不定式作主语为多,故该句以用不定式为宜。Money isn't as valuable as(it is) to know who to trust.
回答于 1秒前
这个句子中的定语从句较为特殊一些,相对少见。因此我根据《剑桥语法》的例句,对此再稍作说明。我们先看下面例句:I said that it might be more efficient to hold the meeting on Saturday morning, which suggestion they all enthusiastically endorsed. 在这个定语从句中,which为关系限定词,与suggestion构成关系短...
回答于 1秒前