as是做状语还是宾补(as分析为连词是否省略了成分)

These conclusions strike me as reasonable，at least from their point of view.

疑问1：这句话中as是否为连词，因为其并不与strike的宾语构成主谓的关系，即宾语并不是reasonable的逻辑主语。

查看字典有两种解释（个人看法，请批评指正）

1.To affect a person with （a strong emotion）

2.To appear to especially as a revelation or as remarkable

是否是第一种解释，将文章的as分析为方式状语/原因状语？

因此补充完整：

These conclusions strike me as it is reasonable.

疑问2:

as作为介词时（宾补）后接形容词等，是否视作省略了being的结构？

as作为连词引导方式状语时，后接形容词，过去分词，是否省略了主语和be动词？原因状语是否也会有入方式状语的情况？

These conclusions strike me as reasonable，at least from their point of view.

句中as是介词，不是连词。你认为 as 前面的 me 并不是后面形容词 reasonable 的逻辑主语，这是对的，形容词 reasonable 的逻辑主语是句子主语These conclusions。

可以视为 as 后面省略了 being，即原句等于：

These conclusions strike me as being reasonable, at least from their point of view.

也可以补充完整为：

These conclusions strike me as they are reasonable.(此时的as才是连词)

这就好下面两句：

We left after the meeting was over. (after 是连词)

We left after the meeting. (after 是介词)

胡德忠 -

擅长：英语 | 采纳率 53% | 回答于 2024-03-17 09:59

其它 0 个回答