我提醒过网友,掌握了一些语法原则后就可以做出正确的推理、判断。不应该每次遇到一个问题都有疑虑,不敢确认。你的理解明明是正确的: 介词of后接how引导的从句,这就是名词性从句。how在这里表示”如何“、”怎样“这样的疑问含义,是个疑问词。疑问词在引导名词从句时,改称为连接代词或连接副词。这些你应该都是知道的,为什...
回答于 1秒前
这段话的前面部分是对当时情景的客观描述。最后一句few in the audience would have wondered why.为作者对当时情况的主观推测。would have wondered why并不是虚拟语气,而是对当时可能的情况的推测:很可能听众中几乎没有人想知道为什么。说话人对过去的情况推测,用情态动词+have done.
回答于 1秒前
你最后的理解是正确的。所有的操作词都有替代作用,此时操作词重读(操作词通常是弱读的),替代前文出现过的谓语动词以及该动词所必需的表语、宾语或必具性状语。该句的前一句是这样的:...however, the conventional view that education should be one of the very highest priorities for promoting rapid economic dev...
回答于 1秒前
保留of, 则强调的是介词短语,即“教育权利”的定语,即少数民族、妇女、儿童和残疾人的受教育权利。如果没有介词of, 则强调的是名词词组,容易被误解为protect的宾语。保留of就避免了可能的歧义。
回答于 1秒前
Reward or punishment are meted out quite independent of human interference. 本句主谓人称不一致,要么谓语改为is,要么主语改为复数。mete out something (to somebody): (formal) to give somebody a punishment; to make somebody suffer bad treatment (正式用词)给予某人惩罚一个句子用形容词作状语还...
回答于 1秒前
你查词典就可知道better可以是及物动词。另外注意拼写。the users' brians 或 the user's brain, 而不是 the user's brains。一个人不可能有多个大脑。
回答于 1秒前
takes in这么明显的错误没人注意到吗?take in是及物短语动词。所以本句为错句。应改为:When we breathe, the oxygen in the air is taken in through our lungs and gives us life.这个句子并不是表示事件,而是习惯意义。when=whenever/every time.Every time we breathe, the oxygen in the air is taken in....
回答于 1秒前
原文是这样的:While she is confident they will succeed, shi lists farming's many challeges: ".You don't often get a day off.Supermarkets put a lot of pressure on farmers to keep price down. With fewer people working on farms it can be isolating." she said. 主人公she罗列从事农业所面...
回答于 1秒前
how many car accidents nationwide are cell phone related.how many 为限定词,修饰主语car accidents。传统语法认为how many作定语,修饰主语car accidents. nationwide为副词作后置定语。这就和 How many students are boys?是一样的用法。
回答于 1秒前