根据上下文,作者的这句话有误,做如下改动后逻辑就通了:Since the commander of the supply company was also deputy of the battalion commander, the new organization enabled the latter to focus exclusively on combat duties, while the former took exclusive care of any logistical and administrative needs....
回答于 2021-02-10 22:30
这百分之百是语法错误,介词of是不可后接that从句的,无论that是否省略。可以修改如下:So we have to let go of the idea that I'm willing to suffer right now.So we have to let go of the idea of being willing to suffer right now.So we have to let go of this idea —— I'm willing to suffer right now.
回答于 2021-02-10 20:34
thus contributing to promoting the establishment of a harmonious community.contributing为现在分词作结果状语,与介词to搭配,promoting...为动名词短语作介词to的宾语。意为:为促进...做出贡献。整体是一个现在分词短语。
回答于 2021-02-10 20:26
你查词典的结果已经说明你对of的理解是错误的。放弃这种想法即可,无须解惑。出生地:place of birth. 生日:date of birth. 你能说你的出生地是北京,北京的用途就是为了让某人出生吗?这个思路是错误的。简单的放弃。多读原文,不要试图改动。你学介词的方法是非常错误的。浪费时间不说,你推测出来的结果多有错误。
回答于 2021-02-10 12:41
stem from是不及物动词stem+介词构成的及物短语动词,后接的名词是介词from的宾语。只要from后接有宾语,stem就是主动意义,所以要用现在分词作状语。例如词典例句:His love of the outdoors stems from his father. 所以,用过去分词作状语是错误的。
回答于 2021-02-10 12:36
If you were to ask Harry what was in the bottle, he would tell you that it contained perfumed mud. 黑体部分用什么时态,取决于语境。如果说话人在讲故事,讲述的是过去的某个情景,然后说这句话,作为读者或听众肯定不可能向故事中的人物提问,所以were to ask, 和 would tell都要用虚拟语气。而what was in the bot...
回答于 2021-02-10 11:45
"Haven't you been in bitter distress once when a helping hand was held out to you? You know how much it means. Couldn't you like to do someone a good turn when you have the chance?" 这二个问句都是修辞性问句。否定形式的修辞性问句表达的是更为强调的肯定意义。 你肯定遇到过十分困难的处境,而当时有人向你...
回答于 2021-02-10 11:20
你的疑惑似乎主要是should和would究竟是时态助动词还是情态动词。其实这个问题很简单。薄冰先生采用的是传统语法体系。传统语法认为英语有16种时态,shall, will 及其过去形式 should, would都是时态助动词,分别表示将来时间和过去将来时间。作为时态助动词,shall和should用于主语为第一人称时。这是英式英语。美式英语则...
回答于 2021-02-10 10:31
短语动词sell out, 可以及物,也可以不及物。所以用主动或被动结构都是可以的。例如《韦氏高阶》例句:Tickets to the concert sold out quickly.The tickets were (all) sold out quickly. 所以,你的问题中的 A 和 D 选项都是正确的。这是出题人的失误。
回答于 2021-02-09 23:08
这个句子是正确的。as比较分句可以同时修饰主句的二个as比较项。尽可能接近且尽可能快。又如:He gave more money to more people than you did.
回答于 2021-02-09 22:04