15490 个回答
seat, seating, seated 的相关疑惑
I saw some villagers ________ on the bench at the end of the room. A.seating B.seat C.seated D.seated themselves 书上的解释是正确的。这个空的位置是宾语补足语的位置。see为感官动词，后接现在分词或不带to的不定式作宾补。seat是个及物动词，如果选A或B，错误都是及物动词没有宾语。选D的错误在于误...
回答于 1秒前
who引导名词性从句用法的疑问
现代英语中，who可以是疑问代词，引导特殊疑问句和间接疑问句；也可以是关系代词，引导定语从句。但在早期英语中who还可以是融合型关系副词，引导名词性关系分句。现代英语见到的who引导的名词性关系分句通常都是格言、谚语之类的古体形式。在日常英语中不宜用who引导名词性关系分句。例如：Who laughs last laughs best. T...
回答于 1秒前
deserve后加that从句的用法
deserve后接that从句的用法比较少见，一般词典都没有收录这种用法。但语法书在讲述虚拟语气时（准确的说在讲解推定式should的用法时）会提及这种用法。Has she deserved that you should treat her like this? Does he deserve that you should treat him like this? He said that he really didn...
回答于 1秒前
定语从句的判断与省加重
网友应注意：标点符号前不空格，后面要空格。你刚好弄反了，以后要注意。下面是我作了修改的，你比较一下是否清楚了很多。There are also other more neutral views, such as those held by people who don't mind advertising, or the idea that advertising is an art form in itself, that, if viewed critically, c...
回答于 1秒前
Without a word more spoken, she left the meeting r
只有可分级形容词或副词才能有比较级。spoken怎么能用more修饰？a word more是一个意群，被你割裂开，讲more分配给没有逻辑关系的spoken。这是你的错误的根源。只注意形式，不考虑形式背后的逻辑，这是你经常理解错误的原因。
回答于 1秒前
the largest-ever defeat for a ruling party 成分分析
正如刘老师分析的那样，这个名词词组相当于一个which引导的从句，which指代前面主句的内容。传统语法将这种which从句分析为非限制性定语从句，修饰主句。这是根据which从句的结构分析的。但将修饰主句分句称为定语从句，显然欠妥，不符合传统语法对定语这个成分的定义。鉴于此，现代语法摈弃了定语从句这个术语，将定语从句...
回答于 1秒前
to being divorced的分析
牛津词典例句如下：There is no longer any stigma attached to being divorced.剑桥词典例句：There is no longer any stigma to being divorced.由此可知 介词to前省略了过去分词attached。离婚不再被认为是耻辱的事。 离婚不再丢人了。
回答于 1秒前
句子成分分析
using money stolen from the 1MDB fund是现在分词短语作bought的方式状语，由于bought表示被动意义，省略了施事者，using的逻辑主语就是省略了的bought的施事者。bought using money stolen from...合起来是过去分词短语作yacht的定语。如果把using改为with，则更为简洁。
回答于 1秒前
老师,这个as怎么理解? The police have excluded robbery as a
as a motive for the murder.为介词短语作宾语补足语。警方已经排除了抢劫是谋杀的动机的可能性。
回答于 1秒前