India and Pakistan are so often at odds that there is a tendency to shrug off their spats, but not since their most recent, full-blown war in 1971 has the risk of escalation been so high.黑体部分等于:but since their most recent, full-blown war in 1971, the risk of escalation has not been so high.即...
回答于 1秒前
我已解答你的问题,被你关闭了。We will never make such a mistake again.这是简单句,你想强调such短语,就是强调宾语,你只需将宾语前置即可:Such a mistake we will never make again.It is such a mistake that we will never make again.这是分裂句,即强调句型。正确。Such a mistake is it that we will never mak...
回答于 1秒前
冒号的总用之一就是引出同位语。例如, I chose three people: Tom, John and Kim. 本句中的冒号就是引出同位语all。改为逗号也可以,但用冒号并不错。只是冒号不及逗号常见而已。
回答于 1秒前
others = other homes。Some designs are better than others. others = other designsothers在此为代词。
回答于 1秒前
take + 时间名词作宾语+to do不定式 通常用于以下结构中:1 It takes/took (sb) time to do sth. It为形式主语,不定式为真正主语。It took him one week to write the report. 2 Sth takes/took (sb) time to do. 不定式为必具性状语,且主语在逻辑上是不定式的宾语。The reprot took him two hours to write....
回答于 1秒前
how little引导名词从句,可能是疑问分句,也可能是感叹分句。所以需要根据上下文逻辑分析。如果how little表示的是the degree的多么少,则为疑问分句。如果表示的是extremely little的意思,则为感叹分句。所以我觉得第一和第三句为疑问分句。第二句为感叹分句。
回答于 1秒前
if从句假设的条件在现在或将来有可能实现, 现代英语用陈述语气。但在早期英语中用动词原型式虚拟语气。这种虚拟语气形式现在主要见于法典或法律文献中。偶尔有人采用仿古体使用,给人之乎者也的极其正式的感觉。所以日常英语中已经完全用陈述语气代替了虚拟语气。正式书面语中,仍可在真实条件句中用should do形式。还可以...
回答于 1秒前
找一本现代语法书,研读一下书中关于将来时间的七种表示法以及它们之间的区别,你就解决了这个问题,并且能知道这里目的二字为什么要打引号。这才是从根本上解决问题,一劳永逸。
回答于 1秒前