Three years has passed before we know it.Three years has passed before we knew it. 这两个句子均为语法错误。know为静态动词,可以活用为动态动词,意为get to know。当用在before从句中时,know=get to know. 如果before从句是用一般现在时代替将来,则get to know为将来时间,主句则应该用将来完成时will have passe...
回答于 1秒前
can作为情态动词有诸多用法,如表示体力或智力方面的能力、表示理论上的可能性、表示推测(否定和疑问句中)、表示允许等。在网友提供的这个语境中,我认为牵涉can的二种用法,即能力和允许。Who did this?I really can't tell you. (could这种过去形式表示现在,属于委婉用法,这个语境中没有委婉的理由,故不该...
回答于 1秒前
if从句表示与现在或将来事实相反的假设时,不分人称一律用were,这是正式语体。但在非正式语体,当主语为单数一、三人称时,可以用was而不用were. 此时意义完全相同,只是语体有差异。不过,if I were you, 和as it were这二个结构中的were不可以用was替换。网友的句子显然是非正式语体,如果用were,虽然语法没有错误,但...
回答于 1秒前
As is shown on this two pictures: In 1900, there are a marjority of fishes in the waters while only one ship on thewaters. And yet, in 1995, there are only one fish while a host of ships on the waters.As is shown in these two pictures, in 1900 there were plenty of fishes but only one fishboat on the...
回答于 1秒前
我觉得四个句子都不妥。句首的unsave places,我觉得是句子的theme,而不是目的地或方向。所以这个句子要么改为: As for/to unsafe places, it is better not to ask children to go there.或者改为:It is better not to ask children to go to unsafe places.
回答于 1秒前
When you read/listen to the story, pay attention to when, where, why and how the event takes place.
回答于 1秒前
I gave you a list of appropriate works of art for you to write about(them). for you to write about (them) 在这里不是定语,而是目的状语。不定式作定语,如果被修饰名词与不定式为动宾关系,不定式必须采用悬空结构(传统语法称为反射不定式)。直接宾语you为不定式的逻辑主语,如果不定式作定语是不需要表示...
回答于 1秒前
夸克将状语分为与主语有关的状语和与宾语有关的状语。例如:He treats the girl like her father. (= as if he were her father 与主语有关的状语)He treats the girl like his daughter. . (= as if she were his daughter..与宾语有关的状语 ) (还可能理解为 as his daughter does)你的句子中,like...
回答于 1秒前
不存在主句否定转移到从句的问题。转移否定指的是从句的否定转移到主句。这是英语的思维习惯使然。在形式上主句是否定句。在语义上从句是否定句。原则上反意问句是根据主句来构成的,所以反意问句为 does she? 少数情况下说话人可能希望听话人就从句内容的真实性发表意见,由于从句在意义上是否定的,所以根据从句构成的反...
回答于 1秒前