15585 个回答
the question why...与the question that...
that引导陈述句，why引导疑问句。既然是question的同位语，从句就必然是个问句。用that引导问句就是错误的。
回答于 1秒前
请从语法角度分析下面句子
would rather后接that从句时，would为及物动词，that从句必须用虚拟语气谓语。will在早期英语中为实意动词，演变到现代英语则只是情态动词了。形容词willing 其实就是早期实意动词will的现在分词。词典would的释义之一：15 old-fashioned + literary — used to say that you wish something was true, had...
回答于 1秒前
could have done 虚拟语气使用困惑？
You've been the prodigal son for four weeks now, and you could have had veal for every meal on a gold dish if you'd wanted it.could have had...和 if you'd wanted...都是虚拟语气形式，表示和过去事实相反的假设。事实上，you并没有用金盘子吃牛肉，事实上you也没有想这么做。从句和主句都是与事实相...
回答于 1秒前
不及物动词emerge后面可以接宾语吗
这个句子类似于 He died a hero. 名词作状语，表示谓语动作发生时主语的身份。如果后接形容词，则形容词作状语，表示谓语动作发生时，主语所处的状态。He died a hero. = When he died, he was a hero.He died young. = When he died, he was young.He emerge a grown man. = When he emerged, he was a grown man. 名词作...
回答于 1秒前
A of B that/which + 从句，that/which一般指代A还是B
虽然你自己编的二个句子很别扭，但你的意思还是表达清楚了。A of B+定语从句，定语从句可能修饰B，也可能修饰A，需要根据逻辑做出判断。
回答于 1秒前
have to的意思是必须的意思还有其他意思吗
That's all you have to do.Listen to what Others Have to Say以上二个句子都不是have to do结构，而是have something to do结构。something移到主语之前了。这个have to do表示必须的情态意义没有任何关系。
回答于 1秒前
I don't hope so和I am not afraid so等问题
你的问题涉及二方面内容：1.转移否定；2.分句替代。1 转移否定指按语义本应出现于从句的否定词not被移至主句的现象。如：I think (that) it's not going to rain today.I don't think (that) it's going to rain today.以上两句话意义相同，第一句否定意义较强，但却不如第二句用得普遍，尤其是在非正式语体。...
回答于 1秒前