曹荣禄
曹荣禄
年费会员 实名认证 专业认证

性别: 注册于 2017-03-17

擅长:动词用法,句法问题

求助
26876鲜花数
738213 经验值
1298个粉丝
18个弟子
主页被访问 152097 次

15621 个回答

0 赞同

英语长的断句问题

回答于 1秒前

0 赞同

that部分是什么从句?

这个that从句为修饰表语形容词的that从句。表示原因。that可以省略。至于这种that从句为什么从句,答疑网网友提问不下十次了,没有必要再回答这个问题了。你只需知道表语形容词可以后接that从句即可。

回答于 1秒前

0 赞同

句子类型

get it into his skull that i am not interested in himit为形式宾语,that为真正宾语从句。= think that I am not interested in him

回答于 1秒前

2 赞同

as过去分词be动词省略

as/than引导比较分句,比较分句采用缩减形式(即替代和省略)是常态,而不是例外。当as/than+be+形容词或be+过去分词时,什么时候be可以省略,什么时候be不可以省略,取决于表语形容词或过去分词为何。《剑桥英语语法》给出了可以省略be的形容词和动词,你可以参考。但作为你,应该作的是主语在阅读实践中总结,把你见过的...

回答于 1秒前

1 赞同

成分分析

你查查词典,看unable是什么词类?这个句子只有一个谓语动词—— could not migrate。

回答于 1秒前

3 赞同

that可以引导状语从句吗

蒋老师疏忽了。trust在本句为名词,to build enough turst. that在本句引导目的状语从句。so that和that都可以引导目的状语从句,单独that引导目的状语从句属于正式语体。加上so, so that为日常用法。

回答于 1秒前

2 赞同

for介词短语作什么成分

put the book on the desk 和 arrange the meeting for Wednesday. 是同样的结构。只不过前者是把宾语放在空间上的一个位置,后者是把宾语放在时间上的一个位置。介词短语要么都分析为与宾语有关的状语,要么都分析为宾补。既然我们把on the desk分析为地点状语,为什么for Wednesday就不是时间状语而是宾补呢?想一想吧。

回答于 1秒前

10 赞同

than was supposed能不能加上主语it或what

There were many more people at the meeting than was supposed.There were many more people at the meeting than it was supposed.There were many more people at the meeting than what was supposed.以上三个都不对。应为: There were many more people at the meeting than (had been) supposed.

回答于 1秒前

7 赞同

语法上该怎么理解这里的they said

这个句子是个错句。语法结构混乱,逻辑也不通。请核对原文,或提供上下文。

回答于 1秒前

10 赞同

请问各位老师“what they were no person listening could ha

Nehemiah Trot, the poet, from the tumbled northwestern side of the graveyard, had begun to declaim his thoughts on the matter, although what they were no person listening could have said, when something happened; something to silence each opinionated mouth, something unprecedented in the history of...

回答于 1秒前