关于你以上两点内容我谈谈自己的看法。1 我在“关于引导三大从句的关联词(分析与辨析)”的解答中赞同用从属关联词而不主张用引导词,理由已经在解答中说了,你可参考。有多数语法书将there be存在句的there称为引导词。如果将引导从句的词项再叫引导词,则出现概念混乱。所以引导从属句的词项不能叫从属连词(连词不能作成...
回答于 1秒前
一个及物动词带了宾语,我们就不必再啰嗦说他们之间是动宾关系,这是说废话。因此当我们说动宾关系的时候就是因为语法上他们不是动词和宾语。只是在逻辑上存在这种关系而已。如I need a book to read. 语法上to read是book的定语。book是need的宾语。但在逻辑关系上,I是to read的逻辑主语,book是to read的逻辑宾语。book...
回答于 1秒前
But he (the writer) has his reward, for he is trusted and convinces, as those who are at the mercy of their own eloquence do not.这个句子中的convinces显然是不及物动词。意为“令人信服”。后面没有宾语。以前答疑网也有过类似的疑问,http://ask.yygrammar.com/q-999.html,质疑下面句子中的convince用法:You mus...
回答于 1秒前
under是介词,应该后接名词结构。five years old中心词是old,是个形容词短语,作介词宾语是不妥的。five years of age中心词是名词years。of age是years的限制性定语。要么years of age一起省略,要么不省略。因此,标准的说法应该是:children under fivechildren under five years of age.另外两种说法如果不是错误的,...
回答于 1秒前
It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a single man in possession of a good fortune, must be in want of a wife.这个句子中的两个逗号都是不应该的,应该删去。It作形式主语,that引导主语从句作真正主语,that前是不用逗号的。理由是that明确it的意义,类似于限制性同位语从句。表语名词truth带了一个后置的过...
回答于 1秒前
They begun to restrict and banned ocean-going voyages, thus missing out on an important opportunity for development.原句有误。restrict为及物动词,必须有宾语,即与动词ban共用一个宾语ocean-going oyages。也就是说restrict和ban是并列关系。ban应改为不定式ban(承前省略to). 谓语begun是过去分词,为非限定形式...
回答于 1秒前
①I like looking for new problems to solve.本句中不定式为定语修饰problems,表示动宾关系。翻译为有待解决的新问题。不定式作定语通常表示谓语时间尚未发生的将来事件。②There are two reception areas where the tenants' guests can sit while they are waiting for the meeting to start.本句中不定式复合结构for...
回答于 1秒前
In China地点状语, ostensibly the focus of Mr Trump's actions同位语解释China, the public response主语 has been more restrained.谓语ostensibly the focus of Mr Trump's actions为名词词组,作China的非限制性同位语,相当于一个非限制性定语从句:which is ostensibly the focus of Mr. Trump's action...
回答于 1秒前