融合型关系词包括融合型关系代词、融合型关系限定词和融合型关系副词。之所以称这类词为融合型关系词,是因为这类词是把先行词和引导定语从句的关系词合二为一了,即先行词与关系词融为一体。例如:融合型关系代词what= the thing which。 其中the thing为先行词,which为关系代词。This is what he gave to me. = This is...
回答于 2020-11-24 16:48
I had often suffered under it, but never more so than during that long drive in the darkness.so为分句替代词,替代前面的分句,即替代I had suffered. 所以 but never more so than... = but I had never suffered more than I did during that long drive in the darkness.
回答于 2020-11-24 16:03
which could have disarranged my plans. 可能把我的计划给打乱了。我现在可能需要改变计划了。说话人根据当前的情况(大雾正向自己的方向移动),推测某件事在过去可能发生了(大雾的出现可能把他的计划打乱了)。所以用could have done.
回答于 2020-11-24 15:55
1 by介词短语是修饰mean的方式状语。2 as 引导时间状语从句,it 指bleeding。当出血发生的时候。happen在此是发生的意思,不是碰巧。3 as引导时间状语从句时为连词,不作成分。
回答于 2020-11-24 13:10
neither可以是限定词、不定代词、连词和副词。just as..., so...为关联从属连词,引导方式状语从句,其中just as后为从句,so后面为主句。正如你们不愿意一样,他们也不愿意。Just as you would not, so neither would they. 这个句子中,neither为副词,意为也不,其前置导致主句部分倒装。
回答于 2020-11-23 22:37
1 They only acted in terms of membership to the extent that they identified with the group.to the extent that为复合连词,引导程度/结果状语从句。他们仅以成员的身份采取行动,他们认同这个群体。2.“Reichert concludes that tyranny does not flourish because offenders are helpless and ignorant ; it flourish...
回答于 2020-11-23 22:26
in that 虽然在形式上是that从句作了介词in的宾语从句,但很多词典和语法家已经把in that重新分析为复合连词,引导原因状语从句,而不再分析为that从句作介词的宾语。所以,这个句子的分析应该是连词in that引导原因状语从句,该从句本身又是个并列句。在书面语中,并列句可以省略第二分句中相同的成分,故省略了系词is。
回答于 2020-11-23 21:45
It is an important, cautionary note that we shouldn't get too carried away with the idea that a computer system can replace doctors and therapists.这不是强调句型。黑体部分的that从句为note的同位语从句。第二个that从句为idea的同位语从句。句首的it为人称代词,指代前文提及的内容。
回答于 2020-11-23 21:40