我举二个例子。This is the book written by Tom. 过去分词短语written by Tom 作定语修饰the book.This is the man lived next door. 过去分词短语lived next door作定语修饰the man.现在核桃夹子网友根据你说的百度百科,第二句的过去分词短语作定语是正确的还是错误的。Lived next door, Mr. Wang often come to my hous...
回答于 1秒前
这项练习应该是某个教材的课后练习,要求学生掌握after和by the time引导时间状语从句的用法。第一句的题句本身有问题,时间状语应该放在地点状语之后,故第一句的题句应改为:When Dave left school, he worked in a zoo for several years. (after)按照练习的要求,最简单的正确答案就是直接用after替换when:After Dave l...
回答于 1秒前
破折号后为插入语,是对nothing的补充说明。And there I was, also preparing to get off at the Atlantic Avenue, with nothing to take care of —not even the usual customary book under my arm.我就站在那里,也准备在Atlantic大街下车,什么心都不用操——甚至也不操心通常习惯性的夹在我腋下的书。
回答于 1秒前
see后接复合宾语,即see sb do sth, see sb doing sth时,see是感官动词。即通过视觉感知到某个信息。see后接宾语从句时,see并不是感官动词,而是认知动词,即通过大脑的分析判断而知晓,意为find out。所以一个盲人也可以通过触觉或听觉 to see that something has happened.
回答于 1秒前
in the red 负债、亏损、亏空、出现赤字。be back in the red: 又负债了。sales are down 销售额下降。down为形容词,way为程度副词,表示下降很多。
回答于 1秒前
Certainly people seem not less interested in success and its signs now than formerly.这个句子是错误的。因为not不能否定比较级。放在这里的not只能理解是否定seem,而否定seem需要借助助动词do, do not seem. 其实,seem+形容词是seem to be+形容词的简略形式。你可以不否定seem, 而否定不定式,句子就正确了:Certai...
回答于 1秒前
1 Because she's always saved what little she earns.及物动词save需要名词词组表示存下的钱。what从句为名词性关系分句,相当于一个名词词组。what为融合型关系限定词,little为不定代词,指代不可数名词money。what little (money)=all the little (money) that. what从句意为:她所挣的不多的钱。how little she ea...
回答于 1秒前
The closest he has come网友要理解这个结构,必须要首先建立一个概念,即关系分句可以修饰形容词或副词最高级。例如下面二个句子中的that从句:She is the most beautiful that she has ever been. He ran the fastest that he had ever run. 这二个句子中,形容词和副词最高级被that引导的限制性关系分句所修饰。He came...
回答于 1秒前
打电话时,我是汤姆,英文是:This is Tom speaking. 这个句子要解释起来就很麻烦了,涉及强调句型的变体。我就不解释了。即这个句子=This is Tom that is speaking. 就Tom提问的特殊疑问句则为Who is it/that speaking? = Who is it that is speaking? that指代who.
回答于 1秒前
must have been a gas. 为情态动词must have done表示现在对过去的情况的推测,说话人并不是在陈述事实,而是在进行推测,尽管他对自己的推测充满信息。句子意为:那必然是/肯定是一种...的气体。如果该用was a gas, 则说话人在陈述一个过去事实。句子意为,那是一种...的气体。gas被二个并列的that定语从句修饰,二个定语...
回答于 1秒前