好像听老师说过,英语习惯上要用 the same…that,不能用 the same…who的,但是下面这句怎么解释?Police
suspected that the same men who were noticed loitering in the halls were
responsible for burglarizing the law office.顺便请老师翻译一下,谢谢!
有人认为,英语要用 not...all 而不是 all...not 来表示部分否定。如:通常说:Not all lawyers
have large incomes. 而不说:All lawyers don't
have large incomes. 但是,下面这句如何解释呢?All that glitters
is not gold. 发光的东西未必都是金子。
I should ___ Peter with his work, but I had a lot of things to do myself.A. help B. have helped C. helping D. be help这句话为什么要用虚拟?是因为but后面的句子用的是一般过去时?(本人英语初级者,不要介意过于深入)
...以修饰介词短语吗?比如下面这道题,它来自2008年高考英语的安徽卷:Fred entered without knocking and, very out of breath, sank ___C___ a chair. A. on
B. off
C. into
D. to句中的very 好像就是修饰介词短语out of breath啊!请问,这类修饰有什么特点...
章振邦新编高级英语语法330-331页:说what=that
which/the thing that.What
remains (=That which remains) in our memories is his courage and undauntedness.好像记得语法网老师说过:复合关系代词what=the thing which 或 the thing
that,但为什么书上说=that which呢?...
...ree with没有接宾语为什么要用介词with?为什么不去掉with?但英语有的词组后面的介词不接名词或代词,介词要去掉。如:I like this kind我喜欢这种。而不用I like this kind of.I'm afraid very much.我非常害怕。而不用I'm afraid of very much.