1. followed 是过去分词,本身表示“被动”和“完成”。being followed 是现在分词的被动式,它也表示“被动”,但不是“完成”。也就是说,过去分词和现在分词的被动式,相同之处都是“被动”,不同之处是“完成和进行”。2. 谓语动词came into 表示“结果”,come 是个“终止性动词”,发生即结束,没有过程。既然如此,followed 也就随之...
回答于 1秒前
1. not that long ago 是非限制性定语,修饰 a time(曾经一次;曾几何时)。这跟英语时间、地点的“从小到大排列” 类似,如:at ten yesterday。先说at ten,再说yesterday。2. that 是程度副词,意为“那么”,等于so 之意。not that long ago = not so long ago。又如:Your son is that naughty. (=so naughty)
回答于 1秒前
“刀具”和“雕刻”,是什么关系?主谓和动宾分不清?网友有点糊涂了吧。我用英语解释carved 和carving 的区别:A carving knife is a knife that can carve things such as wood and nuts. A carved knife is a knife whose handle may have been carved.
回答于 1秒前
句子不完整。faster than I would have thought possible:比我想象的要快。than 引导比较状语从句,且暗示着做了thought 的宾语,possible 是形容词作宾补。
回答于 1秒前
This may require synchronised, though country-specific fiscal stimulus complemented by accommodate monetary policy.这里,though 是副词,不是连词。though 可以单独插入使用,用作“连接副词”,表示对上文意思的“转折”,意为“但是,可是;然而”。本句按照but 理解即可。也就是说:synchronised (同步实施的)和 cou...
回答于 1秒前
not 只是对不定式的否定,不定式作目的状语是常态。根据意思,前文叙述所作的事情,不是为了做某事。显然是做目的状语。but because they want politicians to do a better job,是从原因方面跟不定式并列。句意:选民们选举民粹主义者---可能某某人---并不是为了用独裁取代民主,而是因为他们希望政客们做得更好。
回答于 1秒前
从提问可以看出,网友对“强调句” 这个语法项目,了解甚少。需要补上这一课。可参考《英语强调句的若干问题》http://www.yygrammar.com/Article/201704/5131.html
回答于 1秒前
Hundreds of thousands of people marched against the bill last Sunday, the vast majority of them peacefully. That was followed by street clashes on Wednesday, as the police used tear gas and rubber bullets on demonstrators.【翻译】上周日,数十万人游行反对该法案,其中绝大多数人(行为)是温和的。随后是...
回答于 1秒前
have a difficult time doing sth.doing sth. 为现在分词,作“方面状语”(在doing 之前可以加上in,即可看出) 或 “时间状语”(说明“在...过程中”艰难度过)。
回答于 1秒前
the shift from diets based exclusively on food collection to those based to varying degrees on food production1. 蓝色的from...to...是介词词组,整个介词短语作the shift 的定语。2. 紫色的to varying degrees 是固定短语,是to ...degree 结构,意为“在不同程度上”,插在based on food production 中间...
回答于 1秒前