15587 个回答
Few would argue…是什么意思？（《柯林斯词典》译文质疑）
我认为该句的汉译是错误的。argue的基本意义是提出证据以便支持或反对某观点。argue for/in favor of 表示支持某观点，argue against 表示反对某观点。当argue后接that从句时，that从句的内容就是主语主张的或认为符合实情的。汉语可以翻译为：争辩说，主张、认为等。《朗文》的释义及例句如下：2 [intransitive, transitiv...
回答于 1秒前
There are no /There is no /There is not 有什么区别
1 当你期待不止一个男孩应该出现在舞台上，而实际他们没有出现。你用复数。当你期待一个男孩时，实际舞台上没人，你用单数。no = not a 或者 not any . 用no 为名词否定，用not为动词否定。通常名词否定句，否定的意味更加强烈一些。I don't have money.I have no money. = I don't have any money. 否定意味...
回答于 1秒前
英语难句结构分析
until you have bubbles that cover your skin - this is to lather up - or covers your hair, to lather up with shampoo on your hair.or为并列连词，covers your hair显然与前面的cover your skin并列。cover your skin的主语为that，指代bubbles，为复数。所以covers无疑为cover之误。你既然能发现covers使用的怪异，...
回答于 1秒前
as she had是什么用法
1 （just） as she had when he had first taken a good look at her just as引导的仍然是比较分句，只不过主句没有as, so, the same或者such与as分句呼应。这种比较分句仍然有一个不可补全的空位（gap), 即从句的表语必须省略。she had是she had felt的替代形式（或理解为省略了felt). as分句为主系表结构后接when时...
回答于 1秒前
关于whose function it从句中it的问题
He concluded that the world could be redeemed only by a new religion, whose function it should be to nourish and strengthen the feeble altruism of human.whole function为定语从句的表语，it 为形式主语，should be为定语从句的系词，to nourish...不定式短语为定语从句的真正主语。如果删去it，定语从句结构也是...
回答于 1秒前
How可以修饰名词么
many, much, little, few这个四个词无论作为代词、限定词还是副词，都可以被how修饰，这有什么奇怪呢？既然它们表示数量意义，就有程度的差别，就可以被程度副词修饰。这就是语言背后的逻辑。
回答于 1秒前
语法问题成分和理解
Regularly appeal to both province and central commissariats, accepting as legal whichever decision is more beneficial. 本句为祈使句，隐含的主语为 you. accepting as legal whichever decision is more beneficial 为现在分词短语作伴随状语。accepting的逻辑主语为听话人you. as legal为宾补，whichever dec...
回答于 1秒前
非谓语动词成份分析
fortunate to achieve great wealth 为形容词短语作those的限制性定语。其中不定式修饰形容词，为形容词的状语（夸克称为形容词的补足语）。to quote Ronald Reagan 为插入语，解释引号内是谁说的话。
回答于 1秒前