陈用仪先生的这种说法,我没有在其他语法书中看到。我觉得这种解释不合理。如果这种解释成立的话,那我们就可以说下面句子了: I am reading this book for 3 months. He is working for 8 hours. 可是你实际见到过这种句子吗?《剑桥英语语法》中提到,延续性非终结动词可以通常添加一定的状语,赋予动作结束的意义。以动...
回答于 2021-03-24 20:52
1 该句的主谓结构为:Actual acting does not do the job. 主语和谓语之间插入了一个as引导的比较分句,as (it is) in perfoming...。该比较分句对主语actual acting作补充说明、解释。为非限制性名词修饰语。2 As dismal a commetary as it is, there is a ... 这个as...as...从句为让步状语从句,美式用法。英式用法(...
回答于 2021-03-24 17:27
这是典型的中国考试题。注意逗号。因为逗号的使用,说明前面的动词不是谓语动词(如果是谓语动词就是并列句,需要用分号或逗号+并列连词)。所以,你只需选择非谓语动词形式即可,该结构为独立主格结构作状语。
回答于 2021-03-24 17:01
Why can't the system be used during the entire flight and not just at flying altitude?我认为这个问句是个修辞性否定问句——无须回答。实际表示的是一个强烈的肯定陈述句。即 why can't the system be used... = the system should be used...。所以这个句子等于:The system should be used during the entire flight...
回答于 2021-03-24 16:54
healthy的比较级和最高级,既可以是-er, -est形式,也可以是more, most healthy形式。你的问题是,既然用了one of 结构,food就要用复数形式foods, 而不能用不可数名词food。这类问题你只要一查词典,答案就知道了,无须问别人。要学会自己解决问题,要勤查词典!
回答于 2021-03-24 16:29
I don't want children (to be) taken away from parents and when you prosecute the parents for coming in illegally, which should happen, you have to take the children away. which should happen为非限制性定语从句,which指代when从句内容。这种定语从句必须用逗号分隔。
回答于 2021-03-23 20:15
scarcely less... than... = almost as much ... as ... 。
回答于 2021-03-23 17:47
absorb为及物动词,reflect on 为短语动词,二者共用宾语law, 即absorbing law and reflecting on law.
回答于 2021-03-23 17:40