好像听老师说过,英语习惯上要用 the same…that,不能用 the same…who的,但是下面这句怎么解释?Police
suspected that the same men who were noticed loitering in the halls were
responsible for burglarizing the law office.顺便请老师翻译一下,谢谢!
有人认为,英语要用 not...all 而不是 all...not 来表示部分否定。如:通常说:Not all lawyers
have large incomes. 而不说:All lawyers don't
have large incomes. 但是,下面这句如何解释呢?All that glitters
is not gold. 发光的东西未必都是金子。
2021年新高考全国乙卷(全国卷I)的阅读理解A文中有这样一句:Rome can be pricey for travelers, which is why many
choose to stay in a hostel (旅社). 这里 hostel(旅社)是从 hotel(酒店,宾馆)变来的吧?请专家老师说说它是如何变化来的。
The editor at once sent the journal a fax instructing him to find out the exact number of steps and the height of the wall.the exact number of steps 中 steps 前面为什么不加个定冠词 the 呢?相应的后句的 wall 就加了the?
... didn't think you would have taken advantage of it如何翻译?书上的翻译是:我没想到您竟会趁此机会...1)首先请教老师,would have done 是不是只有2个意思,要么是虚拟,要么是表推测?2)我不懂的是,如果一个将来完成时will have done在...
...饰介词短语吗?比如下面这道题,它来自2008年高考英语的安徽卷:Fred entered without knocking and, very out of breath, sank ___C___ a chair. A. on
B. off
C. into
D. to句中的very 好像就是修饰介词短语out of breath啊!请问,这类修饰有什么特点和规...
1. He pretended not to know about it.该句是否可说成:He pretended that he doesn't know about it.2. He pretended don't know about it.这句话错在有 pretend、do 两个动词了,所以错吗?关于否定的基本概念有些模糊。