By and large, people flet that their actions and hard work—not outside forces—were the deciding factor in how their lives turned out.想问一下最后的从句是什么从句,感觉像定语从句,感觉又不是?turn out 怎么理解?
The author callls thisas destroying without having the power to creat, and I call this critical but not constructive.老师这句话中的destroying是形容词还是动名词?还有call this critical是什么结构?
But
that's not the real reasonApollos and the other participants in the program
are eating only three-quarters of what they used to.老师请问used to这个情态动词后是省略了动词eat吗?
1.Covered with
confusion, I left the room. 2.Convinced that
they were going to poison him, he refused to eat anything. 3.The lichens came
borne by the storms.4.What harm
can he do locked up? 这4个例子是书里给的过去分词例子,非谓语动词和谓语动词同时发生。5.The children
...
...于一般现在时,但事件却不可自由运用于该时态。The flag is red是The flag was red的现在时间对应体(counterpart).(状态)He ate an apple. 但不能说He eats an apple. (除非是剧本的解说)He runs fast. 习惯,为静态意义,或者可以认为这是动态动...
...构中能够很好的理解“逻辑主语”的定义。如:Our child planted a tree. 我们的孩子植了棵树。A tree was planted by our child. 一棵树被我们孩子植了。两个表达中,植树这个动作都是由 our child 发出的,故谓语部分动词的“逻辑主语”都...