这是一个强调结构:It's us, human beings, we the people who create the society we want, not profit.被强调的成分是:us, human beings, we the people。作者有意使用“重复”修辞格,使用4个不同的词汇,强调“我们人类”。we 和the people 是同位语,其实,这4个词语都是同位关系。说明:由于被强调的是句...
回答于 1秒前
Get some information out of them. 老师这里的out of 如何理解?理解1:out of them 看作整体做状语;(正确。把out of 看作“复合介词”,不可分割。)理解2: out 与of them分开处理各自做状语修饰动词么?(错误的分析)这句话是否可以改写为 get out some information of them?(大错而特错)
回答于 1秒前
Since the beginning of the new century, of the five percent increase in the global green leaf area, one quarter has come from China.网友说的应该是介词短语 of the five percent increase in the global green leaf area 吧。这个词组,不是省略,也不是倒装,而是前置!它原本作 one quarter 的定语,...
回答于 1秒前
最简单的办法:网友把 do you suppose 去掉,看看那个说法成立即可。What is the matter? (正)What is happened? (误。happen 无被动)What is the wrong? (误。wrong 是形容词,不加 the)What the trouble is? (误。语序错误)What is the trouble?(正。都是 what 作句子主语,不是 the trouble)
回答于 1秒前
对于这个问题,我认为应该这样界定:1. 不是单个的动词就能直接跟宾语,而是两个或以上的词组动词,才能接宾语的,叫“短语动词”。例如:come acrosslook down upontake care ofmake use of2. 而“动词短语”,是一个相对独立的以动词为中心的短语,基本结构是:v. + object 或 v. + adv. 例如:come...
回答于 1秒前
网友的疑问,很有道理。是的,两句都是方式状语从句,一个由 as 引导,一个由 the way 引导。as = the way。正如网友所疑问的那样,两个句子都是在方式状语从句中,省略了与前文重复的成分,目的是为了简练。补充完整为:They did the experiment as their chemistry teacher had instructed.等于:They did the experiment...
回答于 1秒前
Mr Green, together with his children, has visited China.together with his children, 是方式状语。插在主谓之间,这是好事者为了设计主谓一致的题目,而常见的做法。正常表达为:Mr Green has visited China together with his children.
回答于 1秒前
When he came in, which is not a right time, he was pushed by a man.请问老师这里which是指代的从句吗?which可以指代从句吗?——没错。which 指代时间从句。He wrote a letter that had been tainted, which made him unhappy.这里指代的是定语从句吗?——不对。which 指代前面整个句子。He had worked for a while, whic...
回答于 1秒前
and so have less practice making calls. The dance of talking over one another followed by long pauses and "Oh no, you go first" is unfamiliar, and so it can feel intimidating.红色前面的部分,意思是:“因此,应该少去打电话” (少有打电话的做法)。dance 在本句应该是 trouble(麻烦)之意或“劳而...
回答于 1秒前
这两个句子是网友自己造的吧?1. in this city 的位置不正确。它应该是修饰主句 there be 句型的,被放在定语从句中会产生误解。2. 第二句的主句用现在完成时没有道理:There have been。改为一般现在时,表示现在的存在状态,而定语从句用现在完成时表示影响用法。There are many new buildings in this city which have b...
回答于 1秒前