1.Vegetarians are no longer dismissed as cranksdismiss牛津词典的其中一项意思是不予理会,摒弃,对···不屑一提但是句子的翻译是素食主义者不再被当作怪人,怎么也解释不通啊2.He dismissed the opinion polls as worthless. 他认为民意测...
...egard any language as the property of a particular language, and with no language is it more irrational than with English.请问划线部分是倒装句吗?为何it作主语时可以倒装呢?语法上说人称代词做主语时不可倒装,例如我们不能说:Here comes he. 为何这...
...ons of Queensland, New South Wales, Victoria and South Australia that have no Covid-19 cases are posing major challenges on agricultural supply chains. On agricultural supply chains 中的on 为什么不用 to? 一般不是用pose...to...吗?用on 和 to有什么差别呢?谢谢回答
...前句翻译的衔接),有没有更好的翻译?Another difference between ought/should
and must and have to is that with must and have to we normally
have the impression that the obligation is being or will be fulfilled. This is
particularly the case with the first person but quite often appl...
Now no product seems ______ able to occupy the market.A. have been B. to be C. to have been D. being 答案是B。请教老师,是否可选C?B 表示似乎将要占领市场, C表示似乎已经占据了市场。所以,C是否也正确呢? 谢谢老...
Similarly, we have no reason to doubt that the Eskimo language could be as precise and subtle on the subject of motor manufacture or cricket if these topic formed part of the Eskimos' lifepart前为何不加a,零冠词表示泛指和a表示泛指有何不同?
...lways prepare for a rainy day.Actions speak louder than words.All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy.Distance tests a horse's strength. Time reveals a person's character.请翻译它们并用它们造句。谢谢!
请问从句是不是都需要使用陈述语序,所以不可以使用倒装句?以下两个句子是正确的还是错误的呢:1. We all know that only by working hard can we make ourselves better.2. We were told that in no case can we believe him.
...anent home in the United States came those who had no intention to stay , and who would make some money and then go home.请教曹老师:这句话中是把谓语动词came整个提前而形成的全部倒装吗? 是因为those后面的定语从句太...
... he said. (The
New York Times)The poll also highlighted
not just the gap between the old and young, but their level of
political engagement.(The Guardian - Opinion)
There's no point in multiplying workers unhappy with their lot because of the precariousness of their position,the lack of a guaranteed income and a social safety net. 彭博网的一篇文章,lot because of 从没见过这样的用法,请问老师这句话什么意思?有错误吗...