...问 If these elephants hadn't been rescued, they would still be living on the streets of Bangkok. 这句话是虚拟语气吗? 如果是的话,为什么主句的时态不是用would have done的形式呢?如果不是的话,上下文都是一般现在时,主句为什么突然用了个...
On the other hand, he did not accept as well founded the charge made by some of his criticsthat while he was a good observer, he had nopower of reasoning.短语as well founded,as是什么词性/成分?well founed是什么词性/成分?
The water was deep blue and sunlight glittered on its looking
glass-clear surface.looking在此句中是作形容词还是名词?我的理解是looking是作形容词。但如果looking是作形容词的话,我总觉得looking应该放在glass-clear的后面才对。正如下列例句:a most
dis...
...s can face fines of up to 10,000 yuan if they fail to discourage smoking on their premises.1) be fined up to中,up to 为副词,修饰be fined, 200 yuan为fine的宾语,这样理解对吗?2)fines of up to中,of为介词,up to 的词性为什么?
...不对?后面需要加名词吗?2 But look, there are also some positions that you don’t have to be on
TV for, like a camera person and
sound technician.这里for是什么用法,没看懂!
As much as I'd like to
accuse these speed watchers of being monsters,
I have to consider my own preferred method of watching movies: at regular
speed, on the big TV- but looking at my phone the entire time. 这句话的of being 为什么要加这个being?从语法讲不加也可以,是不是强...
A landmark 2003 study by Goldman Sachs predicted that four economies — Russia,Brazil,India and China — will become a much larger force in the world economy than widely expected,based on projections of demographic and economic growth,with China potentially overtaking Germany this decade.尊敬的...
...ngzhou R&F moved back to the top of the Chinese Super League standings on Monday afternoon with a 4-1 victory over previously unbeaten Liaoning Whowin.上文中的 as 引导的好像是结果从句,但 as 好像不能引导结果从句(我记得),请老师讲解一下,谢谢。
...are still recovering from the catastrophe that struck recently.2. I'm constantly and conscientiously focusing on being grateful for all the amazing and miraculous shit in my life.请哪位老师给这两个句子划一下成分,如有不好理解的地方,还麻烦给一点讲解,谢谢。
They often spend entire afternoons on nothing more productive than mahjong.请问上面的句子是什么意思?我的困惑在 nothing more productive than mahjong。相关链接如下:http://www.yygrammar.com/Article/201105/2237.html