老师们好,请问宾语从句后面如果再跟状语从句,时态怎么处理??(经常见这种句子)Mr. Lee said that it had been at least two years since he _______ Faker.A. had seen B. was seeing C. saw D. has seen
...ere to go to the station to meet her. And, loving the station as they did, it was only natural that they should be there a good hour before there was any chance of Mother's train arriving, even if the train were punctual, which was most unlikely. 请老师们讲一下这里as的用法。谢...
President Trump ordered General Motors to make desperrately needed ventilators.It is very complicated, an expensive piece of equipment.I would say more so than a car.请教老师,more so than 中的so如何理解? 去掉so含义有何不同?
...aginable crises, the coronavirus has shown a unique power to accentuate political differences. Though more devastating than any foreign attack, it is hard to figure as the sort of common enemy Osama bin Laden was.问:这里的figure是什么意思,另外有figure后的 as 怎么理解?
...nic sacred buildings on the planet, each growing the necropolis until it stretched 5 miles across the desert to create a sprawling city of the dead.1)上述growing是否应该改为growing into ? 即这里应该使用vi, 而不是vt.2) stretched 后要加to, stretched to ? 要用vi.请教老...
...省略 being 呢?之所以问是否省略,是因为:At 2,473 metres, it is the
highest mountain pass in Europe.(老师说,介词短语At 2,473 metres是非谓语省略了being,作原因状语。)这是做精读时,我自己无法确定答案才提问的,谢谢老师解答!
...述对自己异地恋的看法有一句话:The best way I can describe it is a constant countdown, I'm either
counting down the days until I can see him again, or I'm savoring how much time
we have left together.我觉得这段话后部分的表达有些问题,可否改成 or how much time we w...
...)
此处为章振邦《新编英语英法教程》中的练习: ①It is fortunate that Robert should have returned the cheque. 答案:
Fortunately,Robert returned the cheque. It is unreasonable that he should protest strongly against it. 答案:
Unreasonably,he protested st...
...必须,其否定结构则须用mustn’t。例如: The children must wait outside, mustn’t they? 当must表推测意为一定时,其否定结构一般也不用mustn’t,而须用助动词(即通常用的do, be或have)的否定式。例如You must have
seen him yesterday, didn’t yo...
Between the desk and the window are some shelves.Next to that is a desk with my computer on it.1. 资料书上说:between ...and....is/are (就近原则)Next to ....is/are......(就近原则)2. 自己以前的理解是:这两个句子都是全倒装,be动词跟主语一致。请问: 资料书...
... to collapsing after lumps of soil were washed away by floods, threatening its foundations. 请问这里的threatening的逻辑主语是谁?
soil和floods好像不太对,还是说是"lumps of soil were washed away by floods"整句话是逻辑主语?