This is often the poet's stock-in-trade, but he seems to single them out in order to send up the very idea of the simile in poetry, as in “Violets blossomed loudly/ like a swear word in an empty tank”.求此句句子结构分析并翻译一下。
The following are all correct responses to "Who told the news to the teacher?" EXCEPT""
A.Jim did this B.Jim did so.C.Jim did that D.Jim did.我认为abcd都是对的,但是这种题的出题人就是故弄玄虚,为了出题而出题。还请老师解答!
I've never had such a thing happening to me before . 向老师请教个问题, 整个句子时态是从"过去一直到现在",但句末却有个"之前",这时如果happening to me 改成从句,该用什么时态 which happened 还是which happens?
下面的句子中when引导的是什么从句?The moon's brightness will wash out the Perseids, so you have to catch the chance before dawn, when the moon is closer to setting.截图里是原文:
新版牛津词典里对literally的一个解释,used to acknowledge that something is not literally true but is used for emphasis or to express strong feeling 用于表示所述之事不具有字面上所显示的真实意义,只是为了加重语气或表示强烈的情绪才作夸张之说。...
Your action _____ your principles.A.compared to B.compared with C.contrasted with D.in comparision to句子缺少谓语D排除;查过字典,选项A=B;答案是C,你的行为与你的道义有差别。为什么不能是A,B呢?
I
have had these impulses since I can remember.1.为何since从句不用since
I have been able to remember?2. 如果从句用since
I have been able to remember,和原句相比,二者在句意上有何细微差异?期待各位老师的帮助,十分感谢。
...作状语时,逻辑主语一般默认为句子的主语。如:He got to the station only to be told the train had
gone. (不定式作状语)猜猜这里的非谓语动词 to be told 的“逻辑主语”是谁?还是动词的“施动者”吗?非也。在这句话中,to be told 的“...
... holding a pair of binoculars.As two of the men were Members of Parliament and the other was the Commanding Officer, the police could not arrest anyone.第一句句中 which there was a basket containing three men 我认为是 under 后接的是宾语从句(介宾结构),对吗?第二...
Perhaps he did not talk very much, and I fancied there was towards the end a look of fatigue in the faces of the women on either side of him. They were finding him heavy. Once or twice Mrs. Strickland's eyes rested on him somewhat anxiously.请教老师:They were finding him heavy. find 是发...
...问老师,These example in the form of inscribed clay tablets that date to shortly before 3000BCE.因为date to是动词短语,后面不是应该加一个名词吗? 请问老师这种just before 和shortly before加一个时间,这种结构怎么理解?我们常见的before之前都是:...
资料上有这样的正误句子:他有必要参加这次会议。误:He is necessary to attend the meeting.正:It is necessary for him to attend the meeting.原因是:necessary 这个形容词不能用“人”作主语。请问老师,这个解释有道理吗?