有网友提到《剑桥英语语法》的一个错误的例句:误:This is a more carefully researched article than his
book was. 老师做出了明确解答。见:https://www.cpsenglish.com/question/57395
而且该书也做出了同样的解释,但我估计还会有不少网友不一定理...
...ght the black coat for me, but I would rather_____the blue one.习题给出的正确答案是have bought。但对于表示过去的愿望不是应该had+过去分词吗?是答案有误吗?2.He left orders that nothing______touched until the police arrived here.A.should be B. ought to be...
老师好,我在一份讲解 be supposed to do 的资料里看到这样一个句子。
She was not supposed to be angry about that.
翻译是,她本不该为此生气。所以,就是她实际上生气了?
可资料里又说 当主语是人时,要表达未发生的情况,要用 be supp...
老师好!请教新目标八上教材中的一句话:But I think friends are like books—you don't need a lot of them
as long as they're good.请问老师,这里a lot of them 不能是“许多它们”吧?那这里是表示部分和整体关系, 类似one of...之类的吗?
各位老师们,请问下面这个句子用 to find 和 finding 的区别是什么?They woke up to find themselves surrounded by water.为什么不能是: They woke up finding themselves surrounded by water?to find 为什么可以表示“意外发现”的含义?
各位老师们,请问下面这个句子用 to find 和 finding 的区别是什么?They woke up to find themselves surrounded by water.为什么不能是: They woke up finding themselves surrounded by water?to find 为什么可以表示“意外发现”的含义?