This is a moving spectacle, for crowds of people stand on the shore watching the lanterns drifting away until they can be seen no more .请问:这个for(翻译成“因为”)是连词吗?但是感觉这个for读起来也不像是在解释原因呢,倒像是起到一个冒号的作用。
下面这个句子中off+what引导宾语从句,其中这个off是"属于"的意思吗?Whalton was about to witness the tragic ending of a desperate chase in the waters off what was then the US Territory of Florida.
She was particularly obsessed with an ideal New
England, which she associated with abundant Thanksgiving meals that she claimed
had "a deep moral influence." 请问…that she claimed had …, 这里应该是双重定语从句,为什么不省略做宾语的that, 却省略做主语的 (that) had...
Historians are now able to read this difficult code ______markings made
in...A. with correlating B. having
correlated 学生想的是with可以用来表示原因,这个词不这么用那是不是有什么条件才能表示这一意思呢?
Some university students carried out a campaign ____ they celebrated their whole day without cell phones.如题摘自2020北京海淀区校级模拟,参考答案给出的是where,解释自然为定语从句作状语。但是否能将其视为同位语从句,而填that?
—Excuse me. Could you tell me ________get to the nearest post office? —Sorry,
I am new here.A.
how can I B. how I could C. how to D. what I can 问:此题答案为C,我知道C项是宾语从句的省略,可B项不省略的难道就是错误的句...
我对下面这句不太理解,重点是括号内的解释不太理解——此句摘自夸克《英语语法大全》p829:The situation is only [即:merely] that (he’s thinking about marrying a fellow doctor). [即你不可以为,比方说,他是在为一个疑难病人操心]