有的同词根的动词、名词和形容词,后边接的介词不一样,比如:I sympathized with the teacher.I felt some sympathy for the teacher.I felt quit sympathetic towards the teacher.这种搭配的介词不一样的情况,是语言使用习惯造成的固定搭配?还是...
资料上有这样的正误句子:他有必要参加这次会议。误:He is necessary to attend the meeting.正:It is necessary for him to attend the meeting.原因是:necessary 这个形容词不能用“人”作主语。请问老师,这个解释有道理吗?
1. That he is still alive is sheer luck.2. Whether the plan is feasible remains to be proved.有以下两个问题:1. 麻烦为上面两个句子划分句子成分,主句和从句都划。2. 第2句最后为什么要用to be proved而不是to proved?是因为to后面不能直接接形容词?
There is no heresy or philosophy so abhorrent to the church as a human being
为什么这个句子中的“no heresy or philosopjy”后面可以省略代词和be,直接跟形容词?不应该是只有先行词当定语从句的宾语时才能省略吗?请老师们指导我