对于网友的这个问题,我与前面两位老师的看法有所不同,但有些地方我也没有把握,提出来向大家请教!对于网友的句子,我的初步理解是(即同意网友的理解):The price was higher than he wished to pay.(正确用法)The price was higher than the price that he wished to pay.(是否符合语法值得怀疑) 网友的句子出自《...
回答于 2022-05-04 22:59
书上的说法不算准确,你的感觉是对的。根据 L. G. Alexander 的 Longman English Grammar,in case 分句完全可以用 might 的。
回答于 2022-04-11 12:42
你的句子中的 far 可以换成 much,也可以换成 a lot, a great deal 等:In many ways, life has become far more comfortable and convenient in the past few decades.=In many ways, life has become much more comfortable and convenient in the past few decades.=In many ways, life has become a lot more comfortab...
回答于 2022-04-02 08:38
完全可以。类似的情况有:now有时也连用一般过去时,此时的 now 意思是“当时”“这时”。如:Now there was nothing he could do except admit defeat. 此时他除了认输别无办法。She heard a knock at the door. Now she was frightened. 她听到敲门声,这里他感到害怕起来。
回答于 2022-03-23 12:24
句中的one more than another 其实是one more way than another 的省略,注意前面一句:There are many ways to express thoughts and ideas… 所以相关短语的意思其实就是:其中的一种方式比另一种方式更能吸引你的孩子。全句意为:You may find that your child is attracted by one more than another. 你可能会发现其中...
回答于 2022-03-23 12:14
take action 和 take actions 都可以说,但从使用情况来看,前者远比后者常见。不过,也有词典只收录了 take actions 而没有收录 take action,如《牛津英语同义词学习词典》的actions词条,就只列了to take actions / measures / steps。
回答于 2022-03-14 21:09
根据韦氏高阶,cut back 表示“减少”时可用作及物或不及物动词,但涉及“使用”(use)时,为不及物动词(不接宾语,或后接介词on再接宾语);涉及“大小或数量”(size or amount)时,为及物动词,可直接后接宾语。网友的句子后接 the use of...作宾语,所以此时的 cut back 为不及物动词,其后应有介词 on:但事实上,我查了...
回答于 2022-03-14 20:49
英语中带否定前缀的单词,尽管含有否定意义,但不被视为否定词。所以你的句子应去掉 not,只用 even to me 即可:误:Jack is unkind, not even to me, as it were.正:Jack is unkind, even to me, as it were.
回答于 2022-03-11 15:41
where 引导地点状语从句时,它是连词,在句子中不充当分句子成分。例句一(位于主句后)Take him where it is quiet. 把他带到安静的地方去。Leave that chair where it is. 把那张椅子留在原处。Put that book back where you found it! 把那本书放回原处!He lives where the climate is mild. 他住在一个气候温暖的地方...
回答于 2022-03-11 15:30