13350 个回答
句式正误判断
I found my luggage missing.I found my luggage lost.以上两句都正确。你们老师的理解和解释是错误的。1. missing 和 lost 都是作宾语补足语，不是定语。2. missing 是形容词作宾补；lost 是过去分词作宾补。3. missing 的意思主要指“行李不见了”，形容词强调状态，它的词义更加广泛，也包括“丢失” 在内。而 lost 意思单一...
回答于 1秒前
表达"一边...一边..."时，as与while的区别？
1.The students took notes as they listened carefully.2.John sings as he works.3.She was singing while I was dancing.4.Meimei watched TV while she ate her supper. 以上四句都正确。我的疑问是：as所在句子的主从句的主语是否要相同？（可以不同）as所在句的延续性动词为什么不用be doing? （只要两个动作延...
回答于 1秒前
As的问题
Individuals were important chiefly as types.as types 的成分，有两种划分：主语补语和方式状语。我倾向后者。从翻译上即可看出来：【翻译】个体的重要性主要体现在特征上。不要翻译成：作为类型的个体很重要。这也说明了作主补的缺陷。 1. 一个句子的主要成分就是主语和谓语。一切修饰成分都是围绕这两大成分展开。...
回答于 1秒前
简单句、并列句、复合句的基本概念能懂，但个别句子不能理解
Depending on which role you choose, you could help to increase a community’s access to safe drinking water, or help to protect valuable local cultures.网友这个问题涉及语法理论。也是很值得讨论的问题。话题：在一个句子的某个成分中包含着一个从句；或者句子的某个成分本身由一个从句充当。那么问题来了，什么...
回答于 1秒前
doing 还是having done?
1. I am sorry I missed ____ you while in Beijing.a. to see b being seen c. seeing d. having seen 2. I remembered _____ the door before I left the office, but forgot to turn off the lights. a. locking b to lock c having locked&nb...
回答于 1秒前
They were cast adrift in a sea of events成分分析
They were cast adrift in a sea of events.【翻译】他们在纷繁的事件中随波逐流。结构分析：They （主语）were cast （谓语动词）adrift （形容词作伴随状语或结果状语）in a sea of events（广义的地点状语）.
回答于 1秒前
句子改写：用名词性从句合并句子
After ten years, she changed a lot that she looked as diffierent as she used to be.你改写的这个句子，实际上把that she looked as diffierent as she used to be. 用作结果状语从句了。但有一个问题，应在a lot 之前加一个限定词such 表示程度才可以，such a lot that...After ten years, she changed such a lot tha...
回答于 1秒前
请问：undergo reform这个动宾结构在句中是做什么成分？
China's Prime Minister Li Keqiang also acknowledged that there would be job losses as state-owned enterprises, particularly in the steel and coal industries, undergo reform, but assured there would be no mass redundancies.请问：undergo reform这个动宾结构在句中是做什么成分？【答】as 从句中，...
回答于 1秒前
“逗号之后的现在分词结构作全句的状语”这句话是什么意思
“逗号之后的现在分词结构作全句的状语”这句话是什么意思？现在分词的逻辑主语/修饰的是整个句子还是主句的主语？【答】“逗号之后的现在分词结构作全句的状语”这句话，本身有问题。1. 逗号之后的现在分词短语和没有逗号的现在分词短语，都可以作状语。逗号只表示停顿。2. “现在分词结构作全句的状语”，这个说法不科学，状语...
回答于 1秒前
explain to sb sth / explain sth to sb的疑惑
explain 是及物动词。其实，这两个都带to，你仔细看看：1. explain sth to sb2. explain to sb sth但不可以跟双宾语，不能说：explain sb sth。句型2是句型1的变式，有时因为explain 的宾语太长而后置。例如：He explained the reason to us. 他向我们解释了原因。He explained to us the reason why he was late. 他向我们...
回答于 1秒前